The Florida District Court ruled, in the name of transparency and to better serve Separation of Powers, that the 11.000 documents seized by the FBI at Mar-a-Lago be turned over to a court appointed Special Master to see what documents are relevant to the dispute between the Office of President Trump and the Biden Administration.

Of the 11,000 documents seized, only 100 have classification markings. As we have reported earlier, when documents are declassified the markings are not made of disappearing ink and do not simply vanish. Documents with “Classification Markings” is a legally meaningless term.  The Biden Administration, in a truly outrageous filing with the Florida District Court, asserts that President Trump is not entitled to any presumption of innocence, that the “markings” automatically mean the documents are classified, which is actually in dispute, as if the court has no role under these circumstances to settle such a dispute.

The FBI seized Trump’s family medical records scrap books, framed pictures, articles of clothing, attorney client provileged documents, and documents subject to executive privilege. 

The Department of Justice (DoJ) asserts that having a special mater appointed will do grievous harm to the country and the people. We have heard that before. When the Trump Administration declassified the FISA filings that showed how the FBI/DoJ lied to the court repeatedly in order to spy on Trump and attempt to set him up as a traitor working for Vladimir Putin, they said the same thing as you can see in the tweets below. 

Links corresponding to the pictures below incase the tweets are deleted LINK1 – LINK2 – LINK3. Click the screen shots to enlarge:

Let's revisit the absolute hysteria related to Trump's declassification of the FISA app on Carter Page. FBI fought it as long as it could with claims any release would endanger national security.

Turns out it was a wholly fraudulent document:https://t.co/skgv6aRU4h

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) September 10, 2022

The Biden Administration court filing gets even more outrageous in ways we cannot give justice to. Below is a detailed review of the filing by famed defense attorney Robert Gouveia. We encourage you to watch every minute so you can see just how off the rails the government’s claims are. 

🧵1/The DOJ’s incessant leaks of grand jury material (Trump/MAL, Save America PAC) are not just sleazy and dishonest — they violate Fed.R.Crim.P 6(e)(2) re GJ secrecy. An aggrieved party may make a motion to the court for contempt sanctions, force gov’t to rebut prime facie case. pic.twitter.com/GglcJp5Fxi

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) September 9, 2022

The Attorney General of Connecticut has launched an investigation against Project Veritas for the “crime” of uncovering, using hidden camera, how Greenwich Schools discriminate against Catholics, older teachers and conservatives. 

Such an investigation is illegal as not only does Project Veritas not have to release its sources and methods, they are also covered by the Connecticut Journalist Shield Law. 

Project Veritas’ response was savage as you will see in the video below. Also below is the full letter the Connecticut AG sent to Project Veritas as well as their response. 

When corporate media or BigTech wants to tell a lie so big that they risk backlash, they whip out the so called “Fact Checkers.” As is so often the case, when you see “Fact Check” brace yourself for a whopper worthy of a mal-adjusted 13 year old. 

As we reported earlier from multiple sources, the court filings show that the National Archives, the FBI and the White House Counsel’s Office (That is Joe Biden’s Lawyer), coordinated closely to engineer the raid on Mar-a-Lago. 

Along comes the Associated Press (AP) with a straw man argument of 
“No, Biden did not order the raid” when the truth is that the Biden White House made the unprecedented and likely illegal step of revoking Trump’s “executive privilege,” which we do not believe will hold up in the courts, and thus directed the National Archives to have the FBI retrieve documents by force that Trump is entitled to have under current case law and the Presidential Records Act. 

To draw an analogy, If Ralphie hired Chad to kill Amy the AP would say, “Ralphie did not kill Amy so he should not be charged with murder.” All the AP is doing is leaving out the middle man in the process. 

Famed Canadian attorney Viva Frei has details.