Justice Department employees contribute Democrats by a 20 to 1 ratio

The Clintons and Obama have brought corrupt Chicago style policing to the federal government.

Washington Times:

Justice Department employees overwhelmingly contribute to Democrats, a trend that has become even more lopsided since Barack Obama’s presidential inauguration, according to a campaign finance research organization.

In the 2016 election cycle, Justice employees gave $438,077 to Hillary Clinton’s Democratic presidential campaign and $23,874 to that of Republican Donald Trump, according to OpenSecrets.org, an arm of the Center for Responsive Politics, which crunched the numbers based on Federal Election Commission reports.

James Comey, Jim Clapper, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Lois Lerner, John Koskinen, dozens of Hillary’s State Department staffers, Rod Rosenstein, John Brennan, Sally Yates, senior FBI Agents like Peter Strzok, CIA operatives like Valerie Plame, etc have either lied under oath and/or lied to Congress, to the courts, engaged in public smear campaigns, obstructed justice, withheld exculpatory evidence, destroyed evidence under subpoena, mishandled classified information and used the Justice Department and/or the intelligence community to unfairly target people for political reasons as was done to Dinesh D’Souza, Paul Manafort, General Flynn, Roger Stone, Rod Blagojevich, George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, etc.

Bill Clinton lied under oath was fined and had his law license removed – notice they did not try to have him thrown in jail for nine years as they are Roger Stone.

Related:

Former AG and Deep State Hack Sally Yates Lied to Congress About Flynn, Russia and Logan Act — Still Walks Free 3 Years Later

Judge Amy Berman Jackson Enters Letters in Roger Stone Sentencing Case File That Praise Judge, Attack Trump and Barr; One Letter Bragged of Burning US Flag When Trump Elected

DEEP STATE GETS COLD FEET: Emergency Meeting of Federal Judges Over Barr and Trump Indefinitely Postponed After Group Called Out by Trump

President Trump Says He Commuted Blago’s ‘Tremendously Ridiculous Sentence’ Prosecuted by ‘the Same People, Comey’

It’s Been 11 Years and Deep State FBI STILL WON’T Turn Over Transcript and 302 of Barack Obama’s Blagojevich Interview …What Are They Hiding?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Using non-disclosure agreements (NDA) against a candidate is unfair and misleading

Stormy Daniels Micheal Avenatti and a CNN anchor

Stormy Daniels Micheal Avenatti /w a CNN anchor

Porn actress Stormy Daniels had a Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with Donald Trump which she violated and got sued for. She formerly claimed that she had an affair with Trump, so Trump wrote her a check with an NDA to make her go away. When it came down to the wire Daniels was forced to admit that she did NOT have sex with Donald Trump.

When you are wealthy or a celebrity, it is often cheaper to write someone a check than to go to court and deal with the bad publicity. Con artists like Stormy Daniels’ lawyer, Michael Avenatti know that which is why they take these cases for a quick buck.

NOTE: Avenatti is now in jail for blackmailing the NIKE corporation.

In this regard, Michael Bloomberg is no different than Donald Trump. Just because you have an NDA with someone does NOT mean you are guilty; quite often the opposite.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Here is “the Russian” CIA/FBI claimed Carter Page, George Papadopoulos and Gen. Flynn “colluded” with…

Svetlana Lokhova1

Svetlana Lokhova

Svetlana Lokhova is “the Russian” that the CIA/FBI claims that all of these people “colluded” with. Lokhova is a BRITISH academic historian who happens to be ethnically Russian. She knew CIA/FBI dirty trickster Stefan Halper and happened to have exchanged emails with General Flynn while researching her book.

Like Halper set up George Papadopoulos and Carter Page, he set her up as well.

This interview is a MUST listen.

Lokhova is suing numerous media outlets, as well as FBI informant Stefan Halper, for defamation and tells The Sara Carter Show that she was used as a target of opportunity by the FBI in an attempt to discredit former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and target President Donald Trump.

Please listen to this extended interview with Sara Carter at one of the links below.

https://omny.fm/shows/the-sara-carter-show/svetlana-lokhova-money-trail-of-fbi-spy-will-expos/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Rush Limbaugh awarded the Medal of Freedom at State of the Union

So here we go with the lies about “Rush Limbaugh is a racist” blah blah…

The simple truth is this; Rush Limbaugh has the complete transcript of every show he has ever done on his web site. He does this so people can look up anything he has ever said for themselves in context.

The “quotes” alleging that LImbaugh said “racist” things are made up. Anyone can go to read the transcript and see for themselves.

Some other things they say Rush has said are snippets presented in a false light. For example the “Barack the Magic Negro” song was about a famed Democrat who called Obama that in the campaign and Rush was making fun of Democrats for being racist and making everything about skin color.

Rush Limbaugh has always had a message of optimism that anyone who works hard and has a good heart can succeed.

Limbaugh’s reaction: I am going to spend the rest of my life trying to earn it…

When bothers this writer is the behavior of certain Democrats during the State of the Union. When Trump announced the lowest recorded unemployment for women, and most minorities in history the Democrats sat on their hands:

Democrats also did not stand for that adorable little girl from the inner city who got her opportunity scholarship to escape a failing public school. Is is because she is black you Democrats? Partisanship is one thing, but there is something seriously wrong with today’s Democratic Party:

UPDATE – Kellyanne isn’t having it….

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

About John Bolton taking corrupt Ukrainian money. It’s true and he wasn’t alone.

john-bolton

**************************************************************
UPDATE – John Bolton in an interview describing the conversation between President Trump and Ukraine President Zelinsky as warm and cordial in August 2019. – VIDEO – http://twitter.com/GKeile/status/1222548002008715264

**************************************************************

I have researched it and yes John Bolton did take $115,000 which was largely supplied by Victor Pinchuk, to attend a conference and give a speech.

Pinchuk is a corrupt Ukrainian Oligarch who was in part behind the phony “Russian Dossier” and protecting Burisma, Hunter Biden etc. Pinchuk also have the Clinton Foundation $29 million.

Other Republicans including Condoleezza Rice and Newt Gingrich took money to speak there as well. They should have known better.

The Atlantic Council (which spreads lots of money to American politicians, mostly Democrats) and the YES (Yalta European Strategy) Foundation are fronts for Pinchuk and his cabal of corruption.

LINKS:

https://pinchukfund.org/en/projects/18442/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/jared-kushner-and-ivanka-trump-made-at-least-82-million-in-outside-income-last-year-while-serving-in-the-white-house-filings-show/2018/06/11/a41d0720-6dab-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/john-bolton-was-paid-115000-to-participate-in-two-panels-sponsored-by-foundation-of-ukrainian-steel-magnate/2018/06/12/df6d48a0-6e67-11e8-afd5-778aca903bbe_story.html

John Bolton Took Six Figures From Ukrainian Oligarch Clinton Foundation Donor

https://www.yes-ukraine.org/en/about/yes-board/victor-pinchuk

https://www.yes-ukraine.org/en/photo-and-video/video/14-a-shchorichna-zustrich-yes/novi-ssha-interesi-zamist-tsinnostey

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

“Witnesses” in the Senate, this is what the elite media isn’t telling you….

All this talk about “Witnesses” in the Senate is misleading. This is what the elite media isn’t telling you.

1 – The Senate’s job is to look at what the House presents and judge it up or down. It is not the proper role of the Senate to try to fill the gaps that the House left. That is like asking the Judge to help out the prosecution who lied or otherwise blew it.

2 – The House did have Democrat witnesses. All of them but one said that “quid pro quo” strings attached to foreign aid to Ukraine (which all Presidents have done and is not illegal as it is the President’s job to conduct foreign policy) was either something they heard, supposed or assumed – none of which legally qualifies as evidence.

UPDATE – Watch the Democrat witnesses for yourself: 

3 – The one witness the Democrats had that did see something first hand saw President Trump say that all he wanted from Ukraine was to keep their promises and that he wanted “no quid pro quo”.

4 – Democrats want Democrat witnesses but blocked all Republican witnesses and would not let the Presidents lawyers cross examine witnesses in the House. Even now the mantra from the Democrats is that Democrats get their “witnesses” and Republicans and the President should get none. Because of this lack of fair due process any accusations that came from the Democratically controlled House is the fruit of a poisonous tree, which is a legal concept as old as English Common Law itself, and should be summarily dismissed.

5 – Democrats in the House had a chance to get all the witnesses they wanted, but they would have ask the Supreme Court for approval, they did not do so.

Why would they need permission from the Court? Because the people that Democrats want to question are Trump’s inside circle of advisors.

Why does that matter?

Because if Congress could subpoena and grill at will every person who gave the President advice said advisors would not be willing to do it and if they did they would censor themselves. The Supreme Court said that the Congress must honor Separation of Powers and cannot harass the President’s advisors. Democrats literally said “we cannot be burdened by the courts” – well sorry Democrats, that is the law for very good reason.

[Editor’s Note: The post below about White House Counsel Don McGahn is another example.]

6 – Lastly, we have a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) with Ukraine. This law compels both sides to assist each other with criminal and tax investigations. Asking Ukraine to coordinate with the US Attorney General is 100% appropriate. Democrats are calling that a crime. It’s pure nonsense.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Don McGahn Will Not Be Testifying to House Democrats, Obama Lower Court Judge Will be Overturned on Appeal

Don McGahn former White House Attorney

Former White House Attorney Don McGahn

U.S. District Court (lower federal court) Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, an Obama appointee, ruled that Don McGahn must testify to Congress about his time as the White House’s top lawyer.

Stop.

That ruling goes against hundreds of years of Common Law, Multiple Supreme Court rulings, and the 6th Amendment to the US Constitution.

Says Judge Jackson in a stunning example of Orwellian Doublespeak:

“DOJ promotes a conception of separation-of-powers principles that gets these constitutional commands exactly backwards,” Jackson wrote in her 120-page opinion. “In reality, it is a core tenet of this Nation’s founding that the powers of a monarch must be split between the branches of the government to prevent tyranny.”

Jackson called absolute immunity “a fiction” that has been propagated by a succession of presidential administrations by simply repeating it as a fact while avoiding testing the principle in court.

The person who has it exactly backwards and WILL have her ruling overturned on appeal is Judge Jackson.

Wikipedia explains this as well as any:

Deliberative process privilege is the common-law principle that the internal processes of the executive branch of a government are immune from normal disclosure or discovery in civil litigations, Freedom of Information Act requests, etc.

The theory behind the protection is that by guaranteeing confidentiality, the government will receive better or more candid advice, recommendations and opinions, resulting in better decisions for society as a whole. The deliberative process privilege is often in dynamic tension with the principle of maximal transparency in government.

The right to have legal deliberation and for an executive to get advice from people without people giving advice being persecuted for doing so is in the public interest. It has been asserted by kings and Presidents alike since before the United States existed.

Wikipedia:

Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of particular information or personnel relating to those confidential communications. The right comes into effect when revealing information would impair governmental functions. Neither executive privilege nor the oversight power of Congress is explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution. However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that executive privilege and congressional oversight each are a consequence of the doctrine of the separation of powers, derived from the supremacy of each branch in its own area of Constitutional activity.

The Supreme Court confirmed the legitimacy of this doctrine in United States v. Nixon in the context of a subpoena emanating from the judiciary, instead of emanating from Congress.

Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that there is no exception for The President in the 6th Amendment, which means that the right to legal counsel and have such communications privileged applies to the President. You have heard of Attorney-Client privilege – well that is what this means.

Democrats have waged a direct assault on the rights of the accused to defend themselves. Can you imagine what the country would look like if they had their way with due process and YOU stood accused? Take a look at Cuba, Venezuela, the former USSR or Maoist China for example.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

FIRST DOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON FBI ABUSES DROPS (VIDEO)

FIRST DOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON FBI ABUSES DROPPED –

Confidential sources such as Christopher Steele who provided the FBI with the bogus “Trump is a Russian Agent” fake dossier and sources that were used to help the FBI lie to the FISA Court to get them to approve spying on the Trump Campaign.

The rules were not followed, the sources and their claims were not vetted deliberately, every area that is supposed to enforce these standard dropped the ball and it seems that the pressure to violate the rules came from the top – In short – an FBI agents and a review committee to not knowingly violate the rules unless ordered to do so by the boss.

Quote OIG:

First, we found that the FBIs’ vetting processes for sources, known as validation, did not comply with the Attorney General Guidelines, particularly with regard to “long term” sources,

Second, we found that the Department’s review committee that approves the FBI’s continued use of long-term confidential sources had not vetted long-term sources in a timely manner and also did not comply with the Attorney General Guidelines.

Third, we found that the FBI didn’t provide agents with clear guidance for how to communicate with confidential sources.

Finally, we found that FBI employees were sometimes discouraged from documenting conclusions and recommendations about sources; and we identified issues with the FBI’s ability to align its confidential sources with its highest threat priorities.

 

https://oig.justice.gov/multimedia/video-11-19-19.htm

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Anti-Tumpters Openly Waging an Assault on the Bill of Rights.

I am seeing a disturbing trend among anti-trump attorney’s such as George Conway and Craig Silverman (as recent examples) who actively dismiss or straight up attack:

1 – The 4th Amendment protection from unreasonable searches (illegal electronic surveillance).

2 – The right to free political speech and freedom of expressive association (In fact remember when every Democrat in the Senate voted for a resolution to amend the 1st Amendment to strip protections for free political speech away).

3 – The right to counsel, the right to cross examine, to face one’s accuser, and the right to an aggressive defense are openly being called “phony” by these people.

 

The core of our Constitutionally enshrined freedoms and protections are under open ridicule and assault.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Democrats Change House Rules, Turn Impeachment Inquiry into a Drumhead Trial

The House finally launches an impeachment Inquiry – This is what the media isn’t telling you.

The Democrats Resolution (with only two Dems voting no) changes the House Rules for impeachment to strip President Trump and Republicans of all due process or any defense whatsoever.

Under these new rules:

The President’s lawyer may not be present.

Republicans have no power of cross examination.

At first Republicans were not even going to be allowed to ask witnesses any questions at all, but Democrats changed it so that Republicans may ask questions, but Democrats can object and order the witness to not answer.

Republicans may not call or subpoena witnesses or evidence.

Republicans have access to evidence and transcripts heavily restricted, in some cases no access to evidence at all.

Democrats and their lackeys in the elite media say that Republicans complain about “process” because they don’t want to talk about “the facts” …..

So let me ask you this, do you think that a courtroom could ever get to the real facts with rules like this if YOU were a defendant under such rules? Process is HOW you get to the facts in the first place.

This is no different than an 1800’s style “Drumhead Trial”

Star Trek, The Next Generation did an episode on just this type of tyranny and it is nothing short of prescient. I encourage everyone to watch the following short video:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

FULL TRUMP RALLY: President Trump holds campaign rally in Dallas, Texas

Everyone should sit down and watch this. If you know anyone who is ignorant about President Trump, make them a nice dinner on condition that they watch this video.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ukraine was asked to investigate Joe Biden’s son – GOOD! Here is why.

I have written on this subject in depth for one of my ghostwriting clients so I cannot link to the piece for NDA reasons or repost all the details here – but in a nutshell:

1 – Ukraine was ran by a Putin stooge who had nationalized certain industries and the profits were not used for the good of the people.

2 – Victor Pinchuk, a Ukrainian billionaire who found himself no longer in favor, got with the Clintons and Obama’s by donating huge money to the Clinton Foundation.

3 – Next thing you know the United States, IMF and other NGO’s are working the Ukrainian election to get a “pro-western” government there. They were successful.

4 – Said state run businesses were sold to Pinchuk and his cronies on the cheap. One of the companies was a large Ukrainian natural gas company who puts Joe Biden’s son on the board of directors and starts paying him $166,000 a month.

5 – This is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Ukrainian organized crime ties with the Democrats.

6 – When Ukrainian organized crime investigators started looking into what was going on. VP Biden himself went to Ukraine and demanded that the prosecutors be fired or the USA would stop Ukraine’s IMF loans.

7 – Biden strikes a deal with China and all the sudden China hires Joe Biden’s son’s consulting firm to the tune of a $1.5 billion private equity deal.

Asking for assistance from other countries when it comes to organized crime on this level is not illegal at all, it is smart. The media is just pretending like it is…and in their minds, it is not the massive organized crime that Biden is involved in that is the scandal, it is the fact that someone is daring to investigate it that they find so offensive.

If you have questions feel free to ask in comments below.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Truth About Mass Killers the Elite Media Won’t Tell You

What we see in the elite media can be scary indeed. It is important to remember that conflict sells and amping that conflict is how they make their money no matter what the truth is or how it affects the country.

The truth is, and the photo below is just a small sample, is that most mass killers are not white. In fact skin color has very little to do with why mass shootings happen.

The overwhelming majority of mass killers have either been the untreated mentally ill or people with toxic ideologies such as various flavors of socialism/marxism or militant Islam.

In the cases of the last two shooters, the El Paso shooter was a socialist and eco-extremist who said in his manifesto that socialism cannot work if we have open borders and everyone can come here. The Dayton shooter was an ANTIFA socialist with a history of juvenile violence. So they both fit the profile like a glove.

The problem with socialist ideologies is that they are partly based on utopianism, in their minds only the evil can be against utopia which, to them, justifies their actions.

Another consistent theme of these mass shooters is Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is preached in the public schools: There is no God, there is no ultimate accountability, humans are just animals and a random accident. Well how do animals treat each other? They tear each other to pieces…

non white mass shooters

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

WalMart Shooter Socialist Manifesto as Linked on Drudge Report – UPDATE: Dayton Shooter Another Socialist

I just read the Walmart Shooter Manifesto as linked on Drudge Report. He hates Republicans & Democrats. He wants universal government healthcare & guaranteed government income. He thinks socialism can’t work if we have open borders & anyone can come here. He is an environmentalist who hates corporations.

He attacked Walmart because its a corporation and seemed to be to be an easy target that likely would not have people who would fight back.

So your basic Social Darwinism/National Socialist stuff combined with a few policy talking points.

I still would like to know why it took 20 minutes for someone to engage the active shooter.

The only CCL member reported nearby was a US Army active duty soldier who was grabbing children and running them to cover/safety.

UPDATE – Someone posted online yesterday that they have a relative in the FBI who said that there would be a coordinated attack across the country by this group. I fear that may be so as the Dayton shooter is also a socialist:

CONNOR BETTS OHIO SHOOTR SOCIALIST

One consistent theme of these mass shooters is Social Darwinism

Social Darwinism is preached in the public schools:
There is no God, there is no ultimate accountability, humans are just animals and a random accident. Well how do animals treat each other? They tear each other to pieces…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mueller Testimony Leaves Lawmakers, Media, Wondering Who Wrote the Report. Mueller Refused to Verify Evidence Report Based Upon.

After going through Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller’s testimony in front of Congress it became obvious, not just to lawmakers and the audience, but even to the hate trump fake news media, that Mueller did not write the report with his name on it. Many wonder if he even read it. Mueller was simply not familiar with the material in his own report. He could not answer dozens of basic questions about the report and several times contradicted what was in it in his testimony.

Editor’s Note: It is also clear by Mueller’s testimony that the man is a bit “infirm” and it is not our mission to humiliate a man who no longer has the ability to defend himself, but that facts are pretty rough on Mueller and his report. We have to tell it as it is as best we can. All in all, NBC News reports that Mueller deflected questions 198 times.

Everytime Mueller was asked about verifying the integrity of the evidence he based the assumptions of his report on…. namely the fake Steele Dossier, the now known fraudulent FISA warrant applications and individuals such as Joseph Misfud who Mueller called Russian Agents who really ended up being US intelligence assets that repeatedly lied to the FBI – Mueller’s answer was “That was out of my purview” or he simply refused to answer.

Mueller didn’t even know who Fusian GPS was in spite of it being in his report and in dozens of media mentions. Fusion GPS was the group that Hillary and DNC law firm Perkins Coie paid who in turn hired former British MI5 Agent Christopher Steele who claimed to have “Russian intelligence” to produce the fake dossier which was the basis for Mueller’s entire Russian investigation.

How is Hillary Clinton, her associates and the DNC immune to allegations of foreign interference in U.S. elections when they commissioned the foreign-sourced dossier and paid for it?

How does one spend over two years doing an investigation and yet have zero interest on the veracity of the evidence handed to you to investigate?

Below is a partial list of what Mueller said was not in the purview of his investigation:

1 – Russian lawyer Natalia Vesilnitskaya who met with Donald Trump Jr. to discuss laws about Russian adoptions had met with Fusion GPS the day before and after the meeting with Trump Jr. Mueller testified that her meeting with Trump Jr. was in his purview, but what she did the day before and day after was not.

2 – Fusion GPS is mentioned in the Mueller report as the “firm that produced the Steele Report (page 103 vol II)” but Fusian GPS is never mentioned by name. Interviewing Christopher Steele’s handlers at Fusion GPS or its owner Glenn Simpson was out of his purview.

3 – Hillary Clinton and the DNC role on manufacturing the fake evidence in the Steele Dossier.

4 – Perkins Couie.

5 – Any foreigners who were involved in the fake steele dossier

6 – The honesty of Christopher steele

7 – FBI abuse of the FISA Court

8 – FBI spying on Trump Campaign

9 – Deputy FBI Director McCabe’s plot to use 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office.

10 – Activities between federal investigators and lawyers in the FBI and Mueller team  leaking to the media.

11 – Obama administration failing to do anything about foreign influence in our elections. No one from the Obama admin was even questioned and all this supposedly happened on their watch. yet, this was “out of his purview.”

I thought that the whole point of having a special prosecutor was to find out what happened with foreign influence in our elections…..I guess not.

But Paul Manafort’s taxes from years ago that had nothing to do with Russia was in Mueller’s purview big time.

If Mueller was not in charge, his deputy, a partisan hack named Andrew Weissmann likely was.

Weissmann has a history of playing fast and loose with legal ethics and also has a history of misapplying the Obstruction of Justice statute. Weismann’s interpretation of the statute was overturned in the Supreme Court 9-0.

Ine the Mueller Report, Weissman accuses Trump of obstruction for defending himself from the leaks put out by the Mueller team and accuses Trump of obstructing for merely defending his innocence and pointing out Mueller’s obvious conflicts of interest as Special Prosecutor as he was a material witness to some of the activities under investigation and he is one of James Comey’s closest friends.

Weismann also claims in the report that Trump, using the presidential powers granted to him under Article II of the Constitution, also amounted to obstruction. There is no obvious intent to obstruct in any of Trump’s actions, in fact he fully cooperated with the Mueller team when he didn’t have to. In short, there is no way that the legal interpretation of obstruction in the Mueller Report would hold up in the Supreme Court.

Even Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein (Mueller’s boss) said that the DoJ did not agree with the Mueller’s Report’s legal interpretation of obstruction, as did Attorney General Bill Barr.

Obstruction? Mueller States That President Trump Didn’t ‘Hinder’ His Investigation ‘at Any Time’

Lastly, this legal mumbo jumbo about Mueller writing 180 pages in volume II of his report going on about “potential crimes” that may exist that were not charged. This violates every prosecutorial ethic in the book.

Our legal system wraps the accused in a cloak of righteousness, a presumption of innocence that is absolute unless proven otherwise beyond reasonable doubt in front of a jury. Yet Mueller goes on saying that he could not exonerate the President. There is NO legal standard in any American lawbook that contains the legal standard of “Not Exonerated.”

How many times do people need to be reminded that the American Justice System is *not* based on “Guilty Until Exonerated”?

It would seem that after Mueller’s enlightening performance in front of Congress any doubts that this entire endeavor was a fraud from the getgo are about to disappear.

Below is a list of the links, memes and video’s of the analysis and new revelations brought out by Mueller’s testimony. We encourage you to watch them all.

Mollie Hemingway: Mueller Doddering Raises Many Questions About Who Precisely Was Running Investigation – Video LINK.

Chris Wallace: Mueller Hearing Has Been A “Disaster” For Democrats, Reputation Of Robert Mueller – Video LINK

Rep. Ratcliffe to Mueller: You Didn’t Follow Special Counsel Rules, You Wrote About Decisions That Weren’t Reached – Video LINK

Rep. Gaetz Grills Mueller: Either There Were No Russians and Steele Made Dossier Up or Russians Lied To Steele – Video LINK

Rep. Nunes Opening Statement: Democrats Colluded With Russian Sources To Develop Steele Dossier – Video LINK

The Hill – Democrats express private disappointment with Mueller testimony

More comments from Democrats – HERE

The Daily Signal – 8 Takeaways From Mueller’s 2 Appearances Before Congress

NY Post – Robert Mueller breaks his silence — and still has nothing

Trey Gowdy: Trey Gowdy Calls Out Robert Mueller For Lying. How is this evidence “outside your purview?”:

Trey Gowdy: The person who learned the most about the Mueller Report was Robert Mueller:

Rep. Devin Nunes opening statement:

Reps. Jordan, Nunes, and Gaetz React to Mueller Hearing:

Joe DiGenova and Victoria Toensing: The public got to see Mueller’s incompetence

Tucker Carlson: Democrats believed that Mueller would save America:

Sen. Graham: It’s clear Mueller wasn’t in charge of the investigation:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

DNA testing reveals a THIRD of “migrants” faked family relationship with children to claim asylum…

If an illegal border crosser shows up with a child in the United States they are pretty much processed and released and asked nicely to show up for court some eight months later. The overwhelming majority never do.

The reason is a 1997 court ruling, Flores v. Reno, which says that the children of illegal border crossers cannot be held in adult prisons with their parents for more than 20 days.

We have come to discover that the cartels and human traffickers take children and then rent them to border crossers for thousands of dollars. After they are released the cartels retrieve the child go back to Mexico and do it all over again.

Loopholes in US law that end up endangering these children can be fixed easily by Congress, but Democrats have dug in their heals and refuse to. The fact that dozens of dead children are found along the border every month doesn’t seem to phase them and/or they just scream that it is somehow Donald Trump’s fault.

Daily Mail UK:

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement pilot of new rapid DNA testing at the border has found that nearly a third of those tested were not biologically related to the children in their custody.

ICE conducted the pilot for a few days earlier this month in El Paso and McAllen, Texas, finding about 30 percent of those tested were not related to the children they claimed were their own, an official told the Washington Examiner.

The official said that these were not cases of step-fathers or adoptive parents.

‘Those were not the case. In these cases, they are misrepresented as family members,’ the official said.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Murder rates drop as concealed carry permits soar

This report is nothing new but is a great update. While murder rates were falling almost in half in the industrialized world during the 1990’s civilian gun ownership in the United States doubled.

women-with-guns-avoid-assault-an

Washington Times:

The number of concealed carry handgun permits has skyrocketed since President Obama was first elected, while murder rates have fallen, according to a new report released Wednesday.

Since 2007, the number of concealed handgun permits has soared from 4.6 million to over 12.8 million, and murder rates have fallen from 5.6 killings per 100,000 people to just 4.2, about a 25 percent drop, according to the report from the Crime Prevention Research Center.

And the number of permits issued is increasing faster every year. Over 1.7 million new permits were issued last year — a 15.4 percent increase over 2013, the largest such single-year jump ever, according to the report from the center led by President John R. Lott and research director John E. Whitley.

The number of concealed carriers is likely even higher, since permits are not required in eight states.

In Florida and Texas permit holders are convicted of misdemeanors or felonies at one-sixth the rate that police officers are convicted, according to the report.

Data on gun sales and recent opinion polls indicate that more people are warming up to the idea of gun ownership. A 2000 Gallup Poll found that 35 percent of Americans thought that owning a gun made their home safer. By 2014 that number soared to 63 percent.

A Dec. 2014 Pew Research poll found, for the first time in more than two decades, there was more support for gun rights than gun control, with 52 percent of respondents saying it is more important to protect the right of Americans to own guns, while 46 percent said it was more important to control gun ownership.

NCIS background checks increased from 11.2 million to 21 million between 2007 and 2014, according to the report, and the sale of guns has skyrocketed over the last two years. About 14 million guns were sold between 2008 and 2011, while over 20 million were sold between 2012 and 2013, and about a quarter were sold to first-time buyers, Mr. Keene said.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Last Seven Months of Anne Frank: A Chilling Reminder to Never Let Government Disarm the Citizenry

Perfect example of why you should support the Second Amendment. Our right to bear arms is protection from our own government. Nazis…. yuck. Horrible human beings. From the book “The Last Seven Months of Anne Frank. Story of Six Women Who Knew Her.”

Last 7 months of Anne Frank

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Video: A New Generation Visits Nazi Death Camps

W5 TV produced this amazing piece of real journalism. W5’s Sandie Rinaldo accompanies young Canadian students visiting Auschwitz along with a survivor of the Nazi death camp.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Donald Trump Donates Over $100,000 to Israeli Emergency Rescue Service

Trump did this before he considered running for office. Yet CNN and the other fake news networks call him an antisemite among other things.

Donald_Trump_and_wife_Melania1-300x225

The Algemeiner:

Real estate tycoon Donald Trump has pledged to donate over $100,000 to Israeli emergency rescue service United Hatzalah, The Algemeiner has learned.

The gift, which will go towards the purchase of four ambucycles, costing $26,000 each, was inspired by his friend, billionaire Stewart Rahr.

Last month, Rahr arranged the donation of 50 ambucycles for the group through his own contribution and that of his friends.

“I just love the energy level of United Hatzalah,” Rahr said at a dedication ceremony in Jerusalem overlooking the Western Wall Plaza and Temple Mount. “I just love everyone sitting here who are part of this Mitzvah today. This is the type of organization I relate to, starting from the bottom just like I started.”

Rahr, a well known New York personality who calls himself “The King of Fun,” has known Trump for several years, The Media Linerecently reported. Trump told the publication how Rahr once attended a charity dinner where the real estate tycoon was being honored and “just stood up and gave a million dollars.”

“That’s the way he is,” he said.

United Hatzalah is Israel’s first and largest all-volunteer emergency rapid response service. It has a fleet of over 250 ambucycles and uses cutting edge patented GPS based dispatch technology.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Alita: Battle Angel” Demonstrates The Genius of James Cameron Once Again

The hit film “Alita: Battle Angel” from James Cameron is out on BluRay. The film is straight up brilliant. A great story, great character development a great hero’s arc, great performances, everything that makes a compelling story compelling is in this film.

alita-_battle_angel

The only complaint I have of the film is that the film trailers which they used to promote the film simply do not do the movie the justice it deserves. One might look at the trailer and think “ahh that is not for me” trust yours truly here….reconsider. You will enjoy this film. 

By contrast, Captain Marvel has an audience score of 55%, Alita: Battle Angel enjoys an audience score of 94%.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Twitter Bans Mother Whose Son Was Murdered by Illegal Alien

Why? Well because she tweeted about it and the “progressives” who love free speech and tolerance cannot allow that. Read about it HERE.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reminder: Democrats Robbed $716 Billion from Medicare to Fund Failed Obamacare

Dems tossing grandma over the cliff

As someone with a journalism degree I find this issue to be particularly vexing. Why? Democrat say almost every election that evil cost cutting Republicans want to take away your Medicare and Social Security. Yet in administration after administration we find that it is Democrats dipping into those benefits for their own agendas.

It was Bill Clinton who signed into law the taxing of Social Security benefits which amounts to double taxation and dips into what the elderly and disabled receive. Then under Obama we saw billions robbed from the programs you and your parents and grandparents have paid into to fund these agenda driven political boondoggles like the failed Obamacare program.

More recently, Democrats in Congress have been voting to cut into these programs, and into funds for veterans care, to pay for illegal aliens. The average person on Social Security or disability receives on average just over $1,400 per month (yours truly helps take care of a disabled friend who gets $1,162) while those claiming to be refugees get  $2,125 per month.

Democrats are throwing our most vulnerable under the bus.

The Daily Signal:

Last week, a new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report updated the amount of money Obamacare robs out of Medicare from $500 billion to a whopping $716 billion between 2013 and 2022.

According to the CBO, the payment cuts in Medicare include:

  • A $260 billion payment cut for hospital services.
  • A $39 billion payment cut for skilled nursing services.
  • A $17 billion payment cut for hospice services.
  • A $66 billion payment cut for home health services.
  • A $33 billion payment cut for all other services.
  • A $156 billion cut in payment rates in Medicare Advantage (MA); $156 billion is before considering interactions with other provisions. The House Ways and Means Committee was able to include interactions with other provisions, estimating the cuts to MA to be even higher, coming in at $308 billion.
  • $56 billion in cuts for disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments.* DSH payments go to hospitals that serve a large number of low-income patients.
  • $114 billion in other provisions pertaining to Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP* (does not include coverage-related provisions).

*Subtract $25 billion total between DSH payments and other provisions for spending that was cut from Medicaid and CHIP.

In total, Obamacare raids Medicare by $716 billion from 2013 to 2022. Despite Medicare facing a 75-year unfunded obligation of $37 trillion, Obamacare uses the savings from the cuts to pay for other provisions in Obamacare, not to help shore up Medicare’s finances.

The impact of these cuts will be detrimental to seniors’ access to care. The Medicare trustees 2012 report concludes that these lower Medicare payment rates will cause an estimated 15 percent of hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies to operate at a loss by 2019, 25 percent to operate at a loss in 2030, and 40 percent by 2050. Operating at a loss means these facilities are likely to cut back their services to Medicare patients or close their doors, making it more difficult for seniors to access these services.

In addition, as MA deteriorates under Obamacare’s cuts, many of those who are enrolled in MA (27 percent of total Medicare beneficiaries) will lose their current health coverage and be forced back into traditional Medicare, where Medicare providers will be subject to further cuts. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services chief actuary predicted in 2010 that enrollment in MA would decrease 50 percent by 2017, when Obamacare’s cuts were estimated at only $145 billion. Now that the cuts have been increased to $156 billion (or possibly $308 billion, as the Ways and Means Committee estimates), MA enrollment will surely decrease even further.

But Obamacare’s raid of Medicare doesn’t stop with cuts; it includes a redirection of tax revenue from the Medicare payroll tax hike in Obamacare. The payroll tax funds Medicare Part A, the trust fund that is projected to become insolvent as soon as 2024. Obamacare increases the tax from 2.9 percent to 3.8 percent, which is projected to cost taxpayers $318 billion from 2013 to 2022. However, for the very first time, Obamacare does not use the tax revenue from the increased Medicare payroll tax to pay for Medicare; the money is used to fund other parts of Obamacare, much like the $716 billion in cuts are.

With a raid on Medicare of this magnitude, President Obama’s assertion that his new law is protecting seniors and Medicare is astonishing. The truth is that Obamacare does the opposite.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Clinton Foundation Got Rich off Poor Haitians

haiti after the hurricane

If you still do not believe that the Clintons are organized crime….well…..

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following article is excerpted from Dinesh D’Souza’s new book, Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party.

In January 2015 a group of Haitians surrounded the New York offices of the Clinton Foundation. They chanted slogans, accusing Bill and Hillary Clinton of having robbed them of “billions of dollars.” Two months later, the Haitians were at it again, accusing the Clintons of duplicity, malfeasance, and theft. And in May 2015, they were back, this time outside New York’s Cipriani, where Bill Clinton received an award and collected a $500,000 check for his foundation. “Clinton, where’s the money?” the Haitian signs read. “In whose pockets?” Said Dhoud Andre of the Commission Against Dictatorship, “We are telling the world of the crimes that Bill and Hillary Clinton are responsible for in Haiti.”

Haitians like Andre may sound a bit strident, but he and the protesters had good reason to be disgruntled. They had suffered a heavy blow from Mother Nature, and now it appeared that they were being battered again — this time by the Clintons. Their story goes back to 2010, when a massive 7.0 earthquake devastated the island, killing more than 200,000 people, leveling 100,000 homes, and leaving 1.5 million people destitute.

The devastating effect of the earthquake on a very poor nation provoked worldwide concern and inspired an outpouring of aid money intended to rebuild Haiti. Countries around the world, as well as private and philanthropic groups such as the Red Cross and the Salvation Army, provided some $10.5 billion in aid, with $3.9 billion of it coming from the United States.

Haitians such as Andre, however, noticed that very little of this aid money actually got to poor people in Haiti. Some projects championed by the Clintons, such as the building of industrial parks and posh hotels, cost a great deal of money and offered scarce benefits to the truly needy. Port-au-Prince was supposed to be rebuilt; it was never rebuilt. Projects aimed at creating jobs proved to be bitter disappointments. Haitian unemployment remained high, largely undented by the funds that were supposed to pour into the country. Famine and illness continued to devastate the island nation.

The Haitians were initially sympathetic to the Clintons. One may say they believed in the message of “hope and change.” With his customary overstatement, Bill told the media, “Wouldn’t it be great if they become the first wireless nation in the world? They could, I’m telling you, they really could.”

I don’t blame the Haitians for falling for it; Bill is one of the world’s greatest story-tellers. He has fooled people far more sophisticated than the poor Haitians. Over time, however, the Haitians wised up. Whatever their initial expectations, many saw that much of the aid money seems never to have reached its destination; rather, it disappeared along the way.

Where did it go? It did not escape the attention of the Haitians that Bill Clinton was the designated UN representative for aid to Haiti. Following the earthquake, Bill Clinton had with media fanfare established the Haiti Reconstruction Fund. Meanwhile, his wife Hillary was the United States secretary of state. She was in charge of U.S. aid allocated to Haiti. Together the Clintons were the two most powerful people who controlled the flow of funds to Haiti from around the world.

Haitian deals appeared to be a quid pro quo for filling the coffers of the Clintons.

The Haitian protesters noticed an interesting pattern involving the Clintons and the designation of how aid funds were used. They observed that a number of companies that received contracts in Haiti happened to be entities that made large donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Haitian contracts appeared less tailored to the needs of Haiti than to the needs of the companies that were performing the services. In sum, Haitian deals appeared to be a quid pro quo for filling the coffers of the Clintons.

For example, the Clinton Foundation selected Clayton Homes, a construction company owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, to build temporary shelters in Haiti. Buffett is an active member of the Clinton Global Initiative who has donated generously to the Clintons as well as the Clinton Foundation. The contract was supposed to be given through the normal United Nations bidding process, with the deal going to the lowest bidder who met the project’s standards. UN officials said, however, that the contract was never competitively bid for.

Clayton offered to build “hurricane-proof trailers” but what they actually delivered turned out to be a disaster. The trailers were structurally unsafe, with high levels of formaldehyde and insulation coming out of the walls. There were problems with mold and fumes. The stifling heat inside made Haitians sick and many of them abandoned the trailers because they were ill-constructed and unusable.

The Clintons also funneled $10 million in federal loans to a firm called InnoVida, headed by Clinton donor Claudio Osorio. Osorio had loaded its board with Clinton cronies, including longtime Clinton ally General Wesley Clark; Hillary’s 2008 finance director Jonathan Mantz; and Democratic fundraiser Chris Korge who has helped raise millions for the Clintons.

Normally the loan approval process takes months or even years. But in this case, a government official wrote, “Former President Bill Clinton is personally in contact with the company to organize its logistical and support needs. And as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has made available State Department resources to assist with logistical arrangements.”

InnoVida had not even provided an independently audited financial report that is normally a requirement for such applications. This requirement, however, was waived. On the basis of the Clinton connection, InnoVida’s application was fast-tracked and approved in two weeks.

The company, however, defaulted on the loan and never built any houses. An investigation revealed that Osorio had diverted company funds to pay for his Miami Beach mansion, his Maserati, and his Colorado ski chalet. He pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering in 2013, and is currently serving a twelve-year prison term on fraud charges related to the loan.

Several Clinton cronies showed up with Bill to a 2011 Housing Expo that cost more than $2 million to stage. Bill Clinton said it would be a model for the construction of thousands of homes in Haiti. In reality, no homes have been built. A few dozen model units were constructed but even they have not been sold. Rather, they are now abandoned and have been taken over by squatters.

The Schools They Never Built

USAID contracts to remove debris in Port-au-Prince went to a Washington-based company named CHF International. The company’s CEO David Weiss, a campaign contributor to Hillary in 2008, was deputy U.S. trade representative for North American Affairs during the Clinton administration. The corporate secretary of the board, Lauri Fitz-Pegado, served in a number of posts in the Clinton administration, including assistant secretary of commerce.The Clintons claim to have built schools in Haiti. But the New York Times discovered that when it comes to the Clintons, “built” is a term with a very loose interpretation. For example, the newspaper located a school featured in the Clinton Foundation annual report as “built through a Clinton Global Initiative Commitment to Action.” In reality, “The Clinton Foundation’s sole direct contribution to the school was a grant for an Earth Day celebration and tree-building activity.”

The Clinton’s’ claim to have built schools in Haiti. But the New York Times discovered that when it comes to the Clintons, ‘built’ is a term with a very loose interpretation.

USAID contracts also went to consulting firms such as New York–based Dalberg Global Development Advisors, which received a $1.5 million contract to identify relocation sites for Haitians. This company is an active participant and financial supporter of the Clinton Global Initiative. A later review by USAID’s inspector general found that Dalberg did a terrible job, naming uninhabitable mountains with steep ravines as possible sites for Haitian rebuilding.

Foreign governments and foreign companies got Haitian deals in exchange for bankrolling the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation lists the Brazilian construction firm OAS and the InterAmerican Development Bank (IDB) as donors that have given it between $1 billion and $5 billion.

The IDB receives funding from the State Department, and some of this funding was diverted to OAS for Haitian road-building contracts. Yet an IDB auditor, Mariela Antiga, complained that the contracts were padded with “excessive costs” to build roads “no one needed.” Antiga also alleged that IDB funds were going to a construction project on private land owned by former Haitian president Rene Preval — a Clinton buddy — and several of his cronies. For her efforts to expose corruption, Antiga was promptly instructed by the IDB to pack her bags and leave Haiti.

In 2011, the Clinton Foundation brokered a deal with Digicel, a cell-phone-service provider seeking to gain access to the Haitian market. The Clintons arranged to have Digicel receive millions in U.S. taxpayer money to provide mobile phones. The USAID Food for Peace program, which the State Department administered through Hillary aide Cheryl Mills, distributed Digicel phones free to Haitians.

Digicel didn’t just make money off the U.S. taxpayer; it also made money off the Haitians. When Haitians used the phones, either to make calls or transfer money, they paid Digicel for the service. Haitians using Digicel’s phones also became automatically enrolled in Digicel’s mobile program. By 2012, Digicel had taken over three-quarters of the cell-phone market in Haiti.

Digicel is owned by Denis O’Brien, a close friend of the Clintons. O’Brien secured three speaking engagements in his native Ireland that paid $200,000 apiece. These engagements occurred right at the time that Digicel was making its deal with the U.S. State Department. O’Brien has also donated lavishly to the Clinton Foundation, giving between $1 million and $5 million sometime in 2010–2011.

Coincidentally the United States government paid Digicel $45 million to open a hotel in Port-au-Prince. Now perhaps it could be argued that Haitians could use a high-priced hotel to attract foreign investors and provide jobs for locals. Thus far, however, this particular hotel seems to employ only a few dozen locals, which hardly justifies the sizable investment that went into building it. Moreover, there are virtually no foreign investors; the rooms are mostly unoccupied; the ones that are taken seem mainly for the benefit of Digicel’s visiting teams.

In addition, the Clintons got their cronies to build Caracol Industrial Park, a 600-acre garment factory that was supposed to make clothes for export to the United States and create — according to Bill Clinton — 100,000 new jobs in Haiti. The project was funded by the U.S. government and cost hundreds of millions in taxpayer money, the largest single allocation of U.S. relief aid.

Yet Caracol has proven a massive failure. First, the industrial park was built on farmland and the farmers had to be moved off their property. Many of them feel they were pushed out and inadequately compensated. Some of them lost their livelihoods. Second, Caracol was supposed to include 25,000 homes for Haitian employees; in the end, the Government Accountability Office reports that only around 6,000 homes were built. Third, Caracol has created 5,000 jobs, less than 10 percent of the jobs promised. Fourth, Caracol is exporting very few products and most of the facility is abandoned. People stand outside every day looking for work, but there is no work to be had, as Haiti’s unemployment rate hovers around 40 percent.

The Clintons say Caracol can still be salvaged. But former Haitian prime minister Jean Bellerive says, “I believe the momentum to attract people there in a massive way is past. Today, it has failed.” Still, Bellerive’s standard of success may not be the same one used by the Clintons. After all, the companies that built Caracol with U.S. taxpayer money have done fine — even if poor Haitians have seen few of the benefits.

Then there is the strange and somehow predictable involvement of Hillary Clinton’s brother Hugh Rodham. Rodham put in an application for $22 million from the Clinton Foundation to build homes on ten thousand acres of land that he said a “guy in Haiti” had “donated” to him.

“I deal through the Clinton Foundation,” Rodham told the New York Times. “I hound my brother-in-law because it’s his fund that we’re going to get our money from.” Rodham said he expected to net $1 million personally on the deal. Unfortunately, his application didn’t go through.

Rodham had better luck, however, on a second Haitian deal. He mysteriously found himself on the advisory board of a U.S. mining company called VCS. This by itself is odd because Rodham’s resume lists no mining experience; rather, Rodham is a former private detective and prison guard.

The mining company, however, seems to have recognized Rodham’s value. They brought him on board in October 2013 to help secure a valuable gold mining permit in Haiti. Rodham was promised a “finder’s fee” if he could land the contract. Sure enough, he did. For the first time in 50 years, Haiti awarded two new gold mining permits and one of them went to the company that had hired Hillary’s brother.

The deal provoked outrage in the Haitian Senate. “Neither Bill Clinton nor the brother of Hillary Clinton are individuals who share the interest of the Haitian people,” said Haitian mining representative Samuel Nesner. “They are part of the elite class who are operating to exploit the Haitian people.”

Is this too harsh a verdict? I wouldn’t go so far as to say the Clintons don’t care about Haiti. Yet it seems clear that Haitian welfare is not their priority. Their priority is, well, themselves. The Clintons seem to believe in Haitian reconstruction and Haitian investment as long as these projects match their own private economic interests. They have steered the rebuilding of Haiti in a way that provides maximum benefit to themselves.

No wonder the Clintons refused to meet with the Haitian protesters. Each time the protesters showed up, the Clintons were nowhere to be seen. They have never directly addressed the Haitians’ claims. Strangely enough, they have never been required to do so. The progressive media scarcely covered the Haitian protest. Somehow the idea of Haitian black people calling out the Clintons as aid money thieves did not appeal to the grand pooh-bahs at CBS News, the New York Times, and NPR.

For most Democrats, the topic is both touchy and distasteful. It’s one thing to rob from the rich but quite another to rob from the poorest of the poor. Some of the Democratic primary support for Bernie Sanders was undoubtedly due to Democrats’ distaste over the financial shenanigans of the Clintons. Probably these Democrats considered the Clintons to be unduly grasping and opportunistic, an embarrassment to the great traditions of the Democratic party.

— Dinesh D’​Souza is the author of Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Google Algorithm Engineer: Big Tech Manipulating Information to Help Democrats

More with the extended interview here at this – LINK.

MORE

MORE

Memo reveals George Soros behind Google, Facebook censorship – LINK

Dan Crenshaw Blasts Google Execs for C Level Employees Calling Religious Jews “Nazi’s”:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Venezuela: The Progressive Dream

Sean Penn w Hugo Chavez

Sean Penn with Hugo Chavez

1992: Venezuela became the third richest country in the hemisphere. Socialist Colonel Hugo Chavez makes two coup attempts. Over 120 people killed. Chavez is jailed for two years before being pardoned.

1997: Venezuela becomes the second largest purchaser of the Ford F-150.

1998: Hugo Chavez is elected president promising socialist equality for all. Hollywood and American Democrats praise Chavez.

2001: Chavez starts passing laws to confiscate land and wealth for “redistribution.” Opponents call it a power grab.

2005: Chavez begins mass property confiscations. New Media laws make it illegal to “slander” politicians.Parties loyal to Chavez make gains after opposition boycotts “rigged” election.

2006: Chavez signs arms deal with Russia.

2007: Chavez makes higher education “free.” Confiscates telecommunications companies and energy companies such as Exxon and ConocoPhillips.

2009: Private ownership of firearms banned. Voters approve a referendum abolishing term limits laws allowing Chavez to be “president for life.”

2010:  Further crushing free speech, new laws aimed at critics of the regime are passed. Venezuelan economy begins to implode. Economy shrinks by 5.8% in a single quarter. Chavez devalues the Bolivar.

2012: Bernie Sanders praises Venezuela for achieving the “American Dream.” Chavez extends government price controls to combat inflation, thus lowering supply and exacerbating shortages. Government threatens to nationalize more businesses.

2013: Hugo Chavez dies of cancer, Nicolas Maduro takes over. Opposition contests election result.

2014: Various opposition leaders are imprisoned. At least 28 people killed in protests. Government loses oil revenue due to global market forces. Food and health care shortages become widespread.

2016: Protests against Maduro get larger. Economic troubles continue.

2017: Laws criminalizing the promotion of “fascism, intolerance, or hate” (sound familiar?) on social media allows government to further state control of the internet.

2018: UN says that at least two million have fled Venezuela.

2019: Opposition leader Juan Guaidó declares himself interim president, appeals to military to oust President Maduro claiming the 2018 election was rigged.

2019: Maduro sends armed thugs into the streets to loot and kill unarmed protestors. Average Venezuelan loses 20 pounds due to starvation. Civil society breaks down.

Lessons learned: You can vote your way into socialist/marxist utopia, but you have to shoot your way out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lucasfilm Attacks Pewdiepie, Christians, Fathers, Husbands…

Since Disney has hired Kathleen Kennedy to run Lucasfilm they results have sub-mediocre films and far less than expected box office draw.

Kennedy has made it clear in her own statements that she does not even consider the legacy of Star Wars and George Lucas (in short she is not a Star Wars fan) and she has also made clear on multiple occasions that her position as head of Lucasfilm has a purpose, to advance a radicalized version of feminism and Social Justice Warrior (SJW) divisive nonsense.

Kennedy has admitted that she had no plan going into this current trilogy, no overall story narrative and is just letting each writer and director do whatever they want, so long as they push her political agenda (No links this time because anyone who can use Google and Youtube can find all of this in mere moments).

Now they are attacking Pewdiepie….

Just how stupid is the stupid at Lucasfilm? Here is The Last Jedi writer and director, who admitted that he did not even look at previous Star Wars films before he wrote The Last Jedi, attacking a Star Wars fan for being a Christian, Father and Husband…..but Pewdiepie is the problem…and Lucasfilm wants to give Rian Johnson a Trilogy all to himself.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

State Department Docs Show Obama Admin/Hillary Lied About Benghazi Attack. Were Arming Jihadists in Syria.

Obama and Hillary said our people were killed  was because a man made a Youtube video. They let our people die without sending help to cover up the fact that once again the Obama Administration was arming the Muslim Brotherhood and terrorists in the Middle-East.

The Obama Administration, as shown by previous reporting and details analysis here, was systematically undermining secular regimes in the Middle-East and trying to replace them with Muslim Brotherhood regimes that wished to wage war on Israel.

We are reposting this as a reminder to readers just how far and how bad Obama and Hillary had lied to us and how far they went to cover it up.

Via Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch: Defense, State Department Documents Reveal Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance

<img class=”i-amphtml-intrinsic-sizer” style=”max-width: 100%; display: block !important;” role=”presentation” src=”data:;base64,” alt=”” aria-hidden=”true” />

Administration knew three months before the November 2012 presidential election of ISIS plans to establish a caliphate in Iraq 

Administration knew of arms being shipped from Benghazi to Syria

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked “Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman” (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance. Rahman is known as the Blind Sheikh, and is serving life in prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist acts.  The new documents also provide the first official confirmation that shows the U.S. government was aware of arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria.  The documents also include an August 2012 analysis warning of the rise of ISIS and the predicted failure of the Obama policy of regime change in Syria.

The documents were released in response to a court order in accordance with a May 15, 2014, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against both the DOD and State Department seeking communications between the two agencies and congressional leaders “on matters related to the activities of any agency or department of the U.S. government at the Special Mission Compound and/or classified annex in Benghazi” (Judicial Watch v U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of State(No. 1:14-cv-00812)).

Spelling and punctuation is duplicated in this release without corrections.

Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group “to kill as many Americans as possible.”  The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council.  The heavily redacted Defense Department “information report” says that the attack on the Benghazi facility “was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR).”  The group subscribes to “AQ ideologies:”

The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for U.S. killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 atacks on the World Trade Center buildings.

“A violent radical,” the DIA report says, is “the leader of BCOAR is Abdul Baset ((AZUZ)), AZUZ was sent by ((ZAWARI)) to set up Al Qaeda (AQ) bases in Libya.”  The group’s headquarters was set up with the approval of a “member of the Muslim brother hood movement…where they have large caches of weapons.  Some of these caches are disguised by feeding troughs for livestock.  They have SA-7 and SA-23/4 MANPADS…they train almost every day focusing on religious lessons and scriptures including three lessons a day of jihadist ideology.”

The Defense Department reported the group maintained written documents, in “a small rectangular room, approximately 12 meters by 6 meters…that contain information on all of the AQ activity in Libya.”

(Azuz is again blamed for the Benghazi attack in an October 2012 DIA document.)

The DOD documents also contain the first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. An October 2012 report confirms:

Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s, and 125 mm and 155mm howitzers missiles.

During the immediate aftermath of, and following the uncertainty caused by, the downfall of the ((Qaddafi)) regime in October 2011 and up until early September of 2012, weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles located in Benghazi, Libya were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the ports of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The Syrian ports were chosen due to the small amount of cargo traffic transiting these two ports. The ships used to transport the weapons were medium-sized and able to hold 10 or less shipping containers of cargo.

The DIA document further details:

The weapons shipped from Syria during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s and 125mm and 155mm howitzers missiles.  The numbers for each weapon were estimated to be: 500 Sniper rifles, 100 RPG launchers with 300 total rounds, and approximately 400 howitzers missiles [200 ea – 125mm and 200ea – 155 mm.]

The heavily redacted document does not disclose who was shipping the weapons.

Another DIA report, written in August 2012 (the same time period the U.S. was monitoring weapons flows from Libya to Syria), said that the opposition in Syria was driven by al Qaeda and other extremist Muslim groups: “the Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.” The growing sectarian direction of the war was predicted to have dire consequences for Iraq, which included the “grave danger” of the rise of ISIS:

The deterioration of the situation has dire consequences on the Iraqi situation and are as follows:

This creates the ideal atmosphere for AQI [al Qaeda Iraq] to return to its old pockets in Mosul and Ramadi, and will provide a renewed momentum under the presumption of unifying the jihad among Sunni Iraq and Syria, and the rest of the Sunnis in the Arab world against what it considers one enemy, the dissenters. ISI could also declare an Islamic state through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq and the protection of its territory.

Some of the “dire consequences” are blacked out but the DIA presciently warned one such consequence would be the “renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.”

From a separate lawsuit, the State Department produced a document created the morning after the Benghazi attack by Hillary Clinton’s offices, and the Operations Center in the Office of the Executive Secretariat that was sent widely through the agency, including to Joseph McManus (then-Hillary Clinton’s executive assistant).  At 6:00 am, a few hours after the attack, the top office of the State Department sent a “spot report” on the “Attack on U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi” that makes no mention of videos or demonstrations:

Four COM personnel were killed and three were wounded in an attack by dozens of fighters on the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi beginning approximately 1550 Eastern Time….

The State Department has yet to turn over any documents from the secret email accounts of Hillary Clinton and other top State Department officials.

“These documents are jaw-dropping. No wonder we had to file more FOIA lawsuits and wait over two years for them.  If the American people had known the truth – that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other top administration officials knew that the Benghazi attack was an al-Qaeda terrorist attack from the get-go – and yet lied and covered this fact up – Mitt Romney might very well be president. And why would the Obama administration continue to support the Muslim Brotherhood even after it knew it was tied to the Benghazi terrorist attack and to al Qaeda? These documents also point to connection between the collapse in Libya and the ISIS war – and confirm that the U.S. knew remarkable details about the transfer of arms from Benghazi to Syrian jihadists,” stated Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president.  “These documents show that the Benghazi cover-up has continued for years and is only unraveling through our independent lawsuits. The Benghazi scandal just got a whole lot worse for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.”

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

USA Today: Trump at 36 percent approval among African-Americans

USA Today:

Even as cable news networks debate reports of the existence of a recording of President Donald Trump using a racial slur, a new poll from Rasmussen Reports says that the president’s approval rating among African-Americans is at 36 percent, nearly double his support at this time last year.

“Today’s @realDonaldTrump approval ratings among black voters: 36%,” Rasmussen said in a tweet. “This day last year: 19%.”

That is a staggeringly high number for a man who only won 8 percent of the African-American vote in 2016.

It is even more unexpected given the president’s rocky history on matters related to race, including his current nasty feud with former White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman, who has alleged Trump said “n word” on the set of the reality-TV show “The Apprentice.”

Conservatives celebrated the poll as a sign of trouble for Democrats in upcoming elections.

Charlie Kirk, the founder of the conservative campus group Turning Point USA, cited the poll as evidence that Trump “is breaking the Democrat party as we know it.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Washington Post: Mexican kids held for months under Obama in cages.

Obama held illegal children in cages2

Washington Post:

By Joshua Partlow
March 11, 2015

LAREDO, Tex. — Last spring, as Central American children flooded into Texas in a way he had never seen in his three-decade career, Border Patrol agent Robert Harris decided to experiment.

His intelligence analysts estimated that 78 percent of the guides smuggling other migrants were Mexicans younger than 18 — teenagers often hired or conscripted by drug cartels that knew they would not be prosecuted if caught — and he wanted to attack this loophole.

“Why don’t we remove these juveniles from the smuggling cycle?” Harris, the outgoing commander of the Laredo sector of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, recalled thinking.

Now, as a result of that decision, young Mexicans are being held for months without charge in shelters across the United States, sometimes without their parents’ knowledge. Since the program began in May, 536 juveniles have been held — 248 of whom have been deported to Mexico after an average stay of 75 days, according to Border Patrol statistics. Mexican authorities say some of these repeat border-crossers have spent as much as six months in U.S. custody while they await an appearance before an immigration judge.

During their detention, they are questioned by U.S. authorities and then transferred to a network of facilities run by the Office of Refugee Resettlement, part of the Department of Health and Human Services, across 15 states. While confined, they undergo psychological evaluations and take English courses. Some are allowed tourist-type activities, such as going to the beach or museums, according to Mexican consular officials in Texas. At least one youth earned a high school general equivalency diploma.

Two U.S. Border Patrol agents patrol the banks of the Rio Grande on Feb. 12 in Laredo, Tex. (Jonathan Levinson/For the Washington Post)
“We haven’t heard of any mistreatment,” said Erasmo R. Martinez, Mexico’s consul in McAllen, Tex.

But the little-known program, called the Juvenile Referral Process, has worried human rights groups and some Mexican officials who fear that it puts the children at risk. They view it as a way for U.S. authorities to gather intelligence about cartels and think it endangers the children who could be targeted as informants when they return to Mexico. Some question the legality of the extended detentions.

“Our concern is that the program’s real intent is to interrogate the kids,” said Maureen Meyer, an expert on Mexico and migrants at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA). The kids are “often questioned about the criminal groups they are working for and then subsequently returned to Mexico with no apparent concern about the implications for them.”

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment