Pfizer asked the court to dismiss a whistleblower lawsuit because the  government was aware the safety and efficacy reporting they submitted to health officials was fraudulent. 

Children’s Health Defense News: 

A lawsuit filed by whistleblower Brook Jackson alleging Pfizer and two of its contractors manipulated data and committed other acts of fraud during Pfizer’s COVID-19 clinical trials is paused following a motion by the defendants to dismiss the case.

In an interview with The Defender, Jackson’s lawyer said Pfizer argued the lawsuit, which was filed under the False Claims Act, should be dismissed because the U.S. government knew of the wrongdoings in the clinical trials but continued to do business with the vaccine maker.

Pfizer is counting on a legal loophole interpreted into the False Claims Act by Supreme Court case law stating that claims of fraud can be dismissed if the fraud was immaterial.  Of course the safety and efficacy of a medical product is not immaterial, rather it is the core of why the testing takes place. 

“Pfizer claims they can get away with fraud as long as the government would write them a check despite knowing about the fraud,” attorney Robert Barnes said.

In short, the government was in on it so it is okay. 

When whistleblower Brook Jackson went to the government with mounds of evidence documenting the fraud she was fired according to her attorney Robert Barnes. 

The Epoch Times published Jackson’s voluminous evidence HERE. 

The suit says Pfizer, ICON, and Ventavia “deliberately withheld crucial information from the United States that calls the safety and efficacy of their vaccine into question.”

“Namely, Defendants concealed violations of both their clinical trial protocol and federal regulations, including falsification of clinical trial documents,” it says.

“Due to Defendants’ scheme, millions of Americans have received a misbranded vaccination which is potentially not as effective as represented.”

The videos below feature attorney Robert Barnes on the Viva Frei vodcast. 

June 4th 2022: 

June 14, 2022: 

August 29, 2022: 

Children’s Health Defense News has a brief summary of Brook Jackson’s evidentiary claims HERE. 

RELATED: 

REMEMBER THOSE DOCUMENTS PFIZER WANTED TO HIDE FOR 75 YEARS? TAKE A LOOK… – LINK. 

83 HIGH PROFILE POLITICAL APPOINTEES NOW WORK FOR BIGPHARMA. PFIZER LOBBYING HITS DECADE HIGH – LINK.

CDC ADMITS AGENCY GAVE FALSE INFORMATION ON COVID-19 VACCINE SAFETY MONITORING – LINK.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky admitted that her agency falsely claimed it was monitoring vaccine safety in 2021 and that it only actually did so from March 2022 – but it still refuses to release the full data.

One of the primary functions of the CDC is to monitor adverse reactions so there is a check and balance to just taking the word of the Drug companies. Millions of people count on the CDC to carry out this important responsibility. Not only did they simply not do so for an extended period of time, the data they did collect they are refusing to release. 

Epoch Times: 

The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has acknowledged publicly for the first time that the agency gave false information about its COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring.

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the agency’s director, said in a letter made public on Sept. 12 that the CDC did not analyze certain types of adverse event reports at all in 2021, despite the agency previously saying it started in February 2021.

“CDC performed PRR analysis between March 25, 2022, through July 31, 2022,” Walensky said. “CDC also recently addressed a previous statement made to the Epoch Times to clarify PRR were not run between February 26, 2021, to September 30, 2021.”

Walensky’s agency had promised in several documents, starting in early 2021, to perform a type of analysis called Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) on reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which it helps manage.

But the agency said in June that it did not perform PRRs. It also said that performing them was “outside th[e] agency’s purview.”

Confronted with the contradiction, Dr. John Su, a CDC official, told The Epoch Times in July that the agency started performing PRRs in February 2021 and “continues to do so to date.”

But just weeks later, the CDC said Su was wrong….

But Wait, It Gets Worse….

Stonewalling

The CDC has still not provided the results of the PRRs that were performed to The Epoch Times. It also did not provide them to Johnson. The Food and Drug Administration, which has conducted Empirical Bayesian data mining on Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System reports, recently refused to provide any of the results to the Epoch Times.

RELATED: 

REMEMBER THOSE DOCUMENTS PFIZER WANTED TO HIDE FOR 75 YEARS? TAKE A LOOK… – LINK. 

83 HIGH PROFILE POLITICAL APPOINTEES NOW WORK FOR BIGPHARMA. PFIZER LOBBYING HITS DECADE HIGH – LINK.

PFIZER TO COURT: DISMISS LAWSUIT BECAUSE GOVERNMENT AWARE VACCINE TESTING FRAUDULENT – LINK.

This is why parents do not trust Disney and why Florida told the Burbank, California based company to go pound sand.

[Editor’s Note: If the New York Times and the Washington Post can do this, so can we.]

Via The Bee:

This couple left California due to the cost of living, crime, taxes, etc. etc. etc. But now they’re not so sure they can get used to living in Texas.

Former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and Tim Pool put on a clinic is now the corporate media engages in libel.