Alex Jones Loses Defamation Lawsuits by Sandy Hook Parents – Why This Helps Conservatives

Alex Jones ranting on Justin Bieber

InfoWars occasionally does decent journalism and that is the problem. So much of their reporting is exaggerated and/or makes claims that are not supported by verifiable evidence. One tactic that infowars uses a great deal, and we have criticized, is they will demonstrate fact A, B and C and then go on to claim that because of that X, Y and Z are real without any evidence.

We all know what Jones said about the parents of those killed at Sandy Hook and we are not going to even repeat it here as it is so vile.

Rachel Maddow uses the same propaganda tactics as InfoWars resulting in Maddow also being sued for defamation. Maddow claimed that OAN News was Russian Propaganda, which everyone knows is a lie.

Rachel Maddow’s lawyers told to the court that no reasonable person would take anything she says as fact. Her lawyers told the court that she routinely engages in hyperbolic speculation and her audience knows that. Since everyone knows that OAN is not Russian propaganda the judges threw the suit out because a reasonable person knows that Maddow is not credible.

Jones could have used a similar defense and in our opinion he would have won if he did. Instead reports are that Jones refused to comply with court mandated discovery and if you do that a court is going to rule against you (now if we could just get judges to do that when the FBi/DoJ refuse to comply with discovery things would be fair).

So how is this good for conservatives?

The corporate media engages in the worst forms of defamation against anyone that steps out of line with the Democrat orthodoxy – racist – sexist – bigot – homophobe – white supremacist – you want to kill old people – you hate children – Hilter – NAZI etc.

The Supreme Court, in a well intentioned zeal to protect free speech, has allows the pendulum to swing too far. Big money interests are taking advantage of that to destroy people with lies maliciously and intentionally.

Every time a defamation case doesn’t get thrown out it is a win for conservatives as the legal pendulum is starting to swing the other way. The libel suits filed by Project Veritas against corporate media liars are a fine example.

The other reason this is a win or conservatives is obvious, Alex Jones’ lies and over the top rants have been used to tar all conservatives. Jones had a big audience and thus a responsibility to make a genuine effort to get it right. He failed spectacularly.

Most conservatives have always considered Jones to be a buffoon, if he could have just admitted that to the court he would have walked.

New IG report on FBI Abuses Damning. Dir. Wray Promised to Fix It – It’s Worse.

DoJ Inspector General Horowitz has issued a new report with even more abuses. 

The FBI lies to the courts, knows it, doesn’t correct the record and it just gets worse. There doesn’t seem to be much punishment which means that at least some of these judges don’t mind. 

The new report is here:

Techno Fog has more details HERE

To put this into context, in December 2019, after IG Horowitz detailed substantial issues with the Carter Page FISA applications, the FISA Court noted that the misconduct was serious and ordered the FBI to conduct remedial measures to fix the problems of the FBI’s own creation. The FBI promised to take corrective action.

One can’t help but speculate that the FISA Court won’t do much about these latest issues, aside from ordering the FBI to conduct more training. After all, the then-presiding judge of the FISA Court, Judge Boasberg, refused jail time for FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith after he altered an e-mail and lied about Carter Page’s relationship with the CIA.  

Knowing the history of the FISA Court excusing government misconduct, we present the same question now that we did after the Clinesmith sentencing: What does it say about the FISA Court’s “heightened duty of candor” if there aren’t heightened punishments for violating that duty?

And we have one final question – one that has applied to Director Wray for the last few years: how could the FBI Director allow these abuses to continue?

Maybe I Was Wrong About Prosecutor John Durham…Maybe… – UPDATED!

“Russiagate” Special Prosecutor John Durham



FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith forged documents and lied to the FISA Court in order to ruin people’s lives by accusing them of crimes they full well knew was innocent. One such person was Carter Page. 

Carter Page does international business and is also an informant for the CIA. The FBI/DoJ along with the Hillary Clinton campaign to manufactured crimes against Page and others who were doing work for the Trump Campaign. 

Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, General Flynn, Trump himself and others were accused of being Russian agents falsely and not by accident. The manufactured evidence was used an an excuse to spy on the Trump campaign and destroy his presidency. 

Long story short, Durham let Clinesmith walk and the sentencing memoranda Durham gave to the court simply was not honest. 

Please read our piece – RIGGED COURTS: FBI Document Forger Who Lied to FISA Court Walks

Famed trial attorney Robert Barnes explains:

After Clinesmith committed all of his crimes, the DC Bar gave Clinesmith his law license back. The Bar Association has been weaponized by Democrats in states where they have control such as New York, Illinois and DC. 

When Durham unveiled his indictment against DNC/Clinton/Perkins Coie attorney Michael Sussmann we reported it and thought the indictment was rather interesting. The indictment shows a conspiracy between several actors to manufacture a case against Trump and his allies. 

We also said:

DNC/Clinton/Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann has been charged with lying to the FBI and his lies weren’t small. Sussmann is also a former federal prosecutor. Even so Sussmann is low hanging fruit.

Durham gave FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith a slap on the wrist which certainly would not have happened if Republicans had done this. Clinesmith altered/forged a document to give to the FISA Court in order to convince the court to authorize spying on President Trump. 

We are concerned that Durham is taking his time to run out the statute of limitations so key Democrats cannot be charged before he issues a scathing report to save his own credibility. 

The indictment –

It seems, and forgive us as we have legal training but are not lawyers, that the reason Durham was so delayed in his indictment of Sussmann is that he had to go to court to penetrate attorney-client privilege in two different jurisdictions. 

The Clintons, like Harvey Weinstein, do their criminal activity using an attorney as a proxy so it all falls under attorney-client privilege. Getting a court ruling to penetrate that isn’t easy and you can be sure the Clintons, DNC, and Perkins Coie resisted. 

Shipwreckedcrew, who writes on substack, is obviously an attorney. Pointed this out in a rather good analysis of the Durham indictment. Most indictments about lying to the FBI are short – XXX lied about XXX and we have XXX evidence he lied, but this indictment is 27 pages long and goes into extreme detail for such a document. 

Durham has just issued more subpoenas to Clinton campaign law firm Perkins Coie. 

Techno Fog published a piece explaining where Durham might go form here which is worth a read:

And although it all looks promising, the fact that Durham let Clinesmith walk when he could have squeezed him for more is disturbing. At this point all those interested in justice can do is wait and hope that Durham can live up to his reputation.

And Joe Biden’s National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan….yeah..

This is not going to age well…..