EDITORIAL
Maybe….
FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith forged documents and lied to the FISA Court in order to ruin people’s lives by accusing them of crimes they full well knew was innocent. One such person was Carter Page.
Carter Page does international business and is also an informant for the CIA. The FBI/DoJ along with the Hillary Clinton campaign to manufactured crimes against Page and others who were doing work for the Trump Campaign.
Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, General Flynn, Trump himself and others were accused of being Russian agents falsely and not by accident. The manufactured evidence was used an an excuse to spy on the Trump campaign and destroy his presidency.
Long story short, Durham let Clinesmith walk and the sentencing memoranda Durham gave to the court simply was not honest.
Please read our piece – RIGGED COURTS: FBI Document Forger Who Lied to FISA Court Walks
Famed trial attorney Robert Barnes explains:
After Clinesmith committed all of his crimes, the DC Bar gave Clinesmith his law license back. The Bar Association has been weaponized by Democrats in states where they have control such as New York, Illinois and DC.
When Durham unveiled his indictment against DNC/Clinton/Perkins Coie attorney Michael Sussmann we reported it and thought the indictment was rather interesting. The indictment shows a conspiracy between several actors to manufacture a case against Trump and his allies.
We also said:
DNC/Clinton/Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann has been charged with lying to the FBI and his lies weren’t small. Sussmann is also a former federal prosecutor. Even so Sussmann is low hanging fruit.
Durham gave FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith a slap on the wrist which certainly would not have happened if Republicans had done this. Clinesmith altered/forged a document to give to the FISA Court in order to convince the court to authorize spying on President Trump.
We are concerned that Durham is taking his time to run out the statute of limitations so key Democrats cannot be charged before he issues a scathing report to save his own credibility.
The indictment – https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-release/file/1433511/download
It seems, and forgive us as we have legal training but are not lawyers, that the reason Durham was so delayed in his indictment of Sussmann is that he had to go to court to penetrate attorney-client privilege in two different jurisdictions.
The Clintons, like Harvey Weinstein, do their criminal activity using an attorney as a proxy so it all falls under attorney-client privilege. Getting a court ruling to penetrate that isn’t easy and you can be sure the Clintons, DNC, and Perkins Coie resisted.
Shipwreckedcrew, who writes on substack, is obviously an attorney. Pointed this out in a rather good analysis of the Durham indictment. Most indictments about lying to the FBI are short – XXX lied about XXX and we have XXX evidence he lied, but this indictment is 27 pages long and goes into extreme detail for such a document.
Durham has just issued more subpoenas to Clinton campaign law firm Perkins Coie.
Techno Fog published a piece explaining where Durham might go form here which is worth a read:
And although it all looks promising, the fact that Durham let Clinesmith walk when he could have squeezed him for more is disturbing. At this point all those interested in justice can do is wait and hope that Durham can live up to his reputation.
And Joe Biden’s National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan….yeah..
This is not going to age well…..
Political Arena 
5 thoughts on “Maybe I Was Wrong About Prosecutor John Durham…Maybe… – UPDATED!”