DNC Chair Donna Brazile in internal campaign mails: economy, people in despair…..

donna-brazile-smile

Donna Brazile seems like such a sweet lady. Look at that bright smile! She wouldn’t lie to you would she?

UPDATE – Donna Brazile received debate questions from CNN in advance and passed them to Hillary. Caught lying about it – LINK.

…….but we now know thanks to tens of thousands of leaked documents via WikiLeaks, congressional investigations, and the courts mandating the release of government documents, that virtually the entire Democratic Party leadership is a corrupt lying cabal that is enriching itself and their donors at our expense…

……and the corporate media either ignores it or simply reports on their web site so they can say that they covered it, which is why you missed it on the front page and on the network news.

[NOTE: The previous Democrat Party Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was forced to step down after leaked emails show that she improperly used the resources and personnel of the DNC to rig the primary against Bernie Sanders.] 

On Twitter, Democratic Party Chairman Donna Brazile tells us that the economy is just great!

And in emails among top Hillary Clinton campaign staffers she says very differently:

donna-brazile-hillary-email-economy-in-dispair

New State Department Docs Show More Illegal Coordination Between Hillary and Big $$$ Donors

When you are the Secretary of State you are mandated to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

Giving donors to your private foundation access to State Department resources and favors when your foundation pays you huge speech fees goes way beyond the mere appearance of impropriety. Giving donors briefings with classified information breaks an entire host of laws. Newly released State Department documents reveal even more of just that.

Of course, the Clinton Foundation being tax free, breaks the law when it engages in partisan politics.

Judicial Watch:

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 207 pages of new Department of State documents, including previously unreleased email exchanges in which Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin worked with top Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) executives to set up group photo sessions for Clinton with “primary sponsors” of CGI and members of the CGI staff. CGI is a project of the Clinton Foundation.

The new records also reveal that Abedin sent classified information concerning “foreign relations or foreign activities of the U.S., including confidential sources,” about Afghanistan to her own unsecured email address.  Also included are more instances of the State Department doing special favors for high-dollar Clinton Foundation donors and the distribution of Clinton’s government schedule to members of the Clinton Foundation staff.

The new documents contained seven Hillary Clinton email exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date of such emails uncovered by Judicial Watch to 235 of new Clinton emails (not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department).  These records further appear to contradict statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department.

Read more HERE.

CNS News has more details:

(CNSNews.com) —  Newly released Department of State documents show that longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin helped top executives at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) set up then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for group photo sessions with primary sponsors of CGI and its staff members in September 2009.

CGI is a project of the Clinton Foundation. Clinton served as Secretary of State from January 2009 to February 2013. The photo sessions occurred at a CGI meeting on Sept. 25, 2009, just prior to a speech by Secretary Clinton.

The documents were obtained by the government watchdog group Judicial Watch. There are 207 pages of State Department material, including a series of email exchanges between Abedin, who served as Clinton’s deputy chief of staff during her time as Secretary of State, and CGI executives regarding a request for a group photo session with Clinton and “about 20” primary CGI sponsors prior to the secretary’s speech.

Although not mentioned by name in the email exchange, the primary sponsors of the 2009 CGI Annual Meeting, according to Judicial Watch and the CGI website, included Tom Golisano; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Laureate International Universities; P&G; Victor Pinchuk Foundation; Grupo ABC; Shangri La Industries; Booz Allen Hamilton; Cisco; Duke Energy; ExxonMobil; Hewlett-Packard Company; Standard Chartered; Swiss Re; Goldman Sachs; The Rockefeller Foundation; CLSA (Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia); Crédit Agricole; The EKTA Foundation; The Economist; Dell; Deutsche Bank; Microsoft; Inter-American Development Bank; Visa; APCO Worldwide; Diageo; Knoll; and PR Newswire.

Clinton Campaign emails: How do we answer when asked about the (illegal) deletions?

The Federal Records Act says that government business on email must be archived on government servers. The Espionage Act says that classified information may not go out on unsecured or unauthorized networks. The law is that once something is under subpoena if you delete it, that is obstruction of justice.

Hillary and her staff did all of this countless times. When asked about it the reflexive answer was not just to simply tell the truth, it was to invent the best possible answer to benefit them. This of course, is also obstruction because they know that the FBI and Congress will be asking these very questions. No indication of just telling the truth is suggested.

You can real the email HERE:

hillary-email-sept-4-2015-deleted-email-talking-points

VIDEO: Clinton Campaign appears to feed NBC’s Andrea Mitchell questions via cell-phone

We have seen this before. Hillary Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill gives hand picked questions to friendly reporters.

Thanks to Hillary’s campaign emails being released by Wikileaks we know that a great many reporters, like NBC’s Andrea Mitchell shown here, are advising and coordinating with the campaign to give the most favorable coverage possible.

Former FBI Deputry Director: Investigation of Hillary Absolutely Contrary to How FBI Operates

Former FBI Director James Kallstrom explains how he is heart broken by how the Obama Administration and FBI Director Comey have conducted themselves in the investigation of multiple violations of the Espionage Act  and the Federal Records Act by Hillary Clinton and her top staff.

Listen for yourself:

RELATED: FBI Tried to Conceal State Dept Offer of Quid-Pro-Quo to FBI to Cover for Hillary https://politicalarena.org/2016/10/17/11872/

Tax Returns Show Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10% on Charitable Grants, Not 90%

Remember when Hillary said in the debate that 90% of what the Clinton Foundation brings in goes to charity and those in need? Well those in need must include themselves and their pals according to their 2013 tax filing:

http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2013/311/580/2013-311580204-0b0083da-9.pdf

Their tweet with graphic below is simply a lie straight up.


The Federalist
:

There’s only one problem: that claim is demonstrably false. And it is false not according to some partisan spin on the numbers, but because the organization’s own tax filings contradict the claim.

clinton-foundation-2013-breakdown-federalist

In order for the 88 percent claim to be even remotely close to the truth, the words “directly” and “life-changing” have to mean something other than “directly” and “life-changing.” For example, the Clinton Foundation spent nearly $8.5 million–10 percent of all 2013 expenditures–on travel. Do plane tickets and hotel accommodations directly change lives? Nearly $4.8 million–5.6 percent of all expenditures–was spent on office supplies. Are ink cartridges and staplers “life-changing” commodities?

Those two categories alone comprise over 15 percent of all Clinton Foundation expenses in 2013, and we haven’t even examined other spending categories like employee fringe benefits ($3.7 million), IT costs ($2.1 million), rent ($4 million) or conferences and conventions ($9.2 million). Yet, the tax-exempt organization claimed in its tweet that no more than 12 percent of its expenditures went to these overhead expenses.

How can both claims be true? Easy: they’re not. The claim from the Clinton Foundation that 88 percent of all expenditures go directly to life-changing work is demonstrably false.

Democrats laughed at Romney when he said Russia was a geopolitical threat…

obama-on-russia-romney-2012

Remember when Democrats Laughed at Romney when he said Russia was a geopolitical threat? Now Hillary and the Democrats can’t stop saying it.

By the RSC:

On Russia, Obama Has Completely Flipped From His 2012 Viewpoint: 7 Key Points.

The media thought President Obama’s best zinger in the October 22, 2012 debate was telling Mitt Romney “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back, because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.”

He also said Romney “acts like he thinks the Cold War’s on. I don’t know where he’s been.”

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev backed up Obama and said Romney was stuck in a Cold War mentality.

The Democratic Party described it as an example of “Romney vs. reality”, and claiming Russia is a foe demonstrates “Romney’s not ready.”

Gen. Joe Dunford was appointed Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by Obama, and agreed with Romney’s warning. Russia’s UN envoy has said that relations with America are at their tensest in 40 years.

Romney’s position has become the conventional view, and Vladimir Putin is constantly scaring the world.

The important point is what Obama is saying today. The President has completely reversed himself and now says Russia:

1) Is hitting us with constant cyber attacks and has hacked into election sites. He claims they are trying to undermine our democracy.

2) Sanctions on Russia expire next month, and Obama is urging European leaders to keep and increase them.

3) He says Russia has broken many of their promises and is guilty of mass slaughter of innocent civilians in Syria, where over 500,000 have died.

4) He says they illegally annexed Crimea and are threatening eastern Ukraine where 10,000 have died.

5) The State Department says Russia has moved nuclear weapons into Kaliningrad and is threatening the Baltic states and Europe.

6) Russia’s state owned television news is full of nuclear threats, and reports on ballistic missiles and bomb shelters.

7) Putin has learned that he can defy America and come out on top. Mild Western sanctions make ordinary Russians worse off, but they also give the people an enemy to unite against.

NYT: Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Related – THERE IS NO DEFENSE – HILLARY’S MISUSE OF HER POSITION AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT FOR PAY FOR PLAY SCHEMES

Wikileaks: Podesta’s Daughter Received His Shares in Putin-Linked Company

Flashback April, 23, 2015 New York Times:

The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Miss USA 2005: Trump has been my mentor for 11 years. Blasts phony Trump accusers.

chelsea-cooley-miss-usa-2005
Chelsea Cooley Miss USA 2005

Donald Trump is surrounded by and mentors women like Chelsea Cooley pictured above every day. Trump has deep pockets and as yet has never been sued for sexual harassment or accused of anything until three weeks before a presidential election.

We are just going to say it. Are we to believe a People Magazine reporter whose story is falling apart, that claims that Donald chased her around the furniture on his one year anniversary with the magnificent Melania? Being impolitic but brutally honest because truth matters, the reporter from People Magazine is straight up homely.

Cooley tells the UK Daily Mail:

[Editor’s Note – Notice that Cooley had to talk to the UK newspapers as the New York Times, AP and the American TV Networks won’t speak with her…]

  • Chelsea Cooley competed in Donald Trump’s Miss Universe competition in 2005, after being crowned Miss USA in the same year
  • She says she will always be grateful to Trump for the kindness he showed her, adding that he has become her business mentor in recent years
  • Cooley questions the credibility of women who have rocked Trump’s political campaign with sexual assault allegations
  • Cooley, who herself was sexually assaulted by a restaurant manager when she was just 16,  also questions the timing of the alleged victims’ claims 
  • Cooley, who has known Trump for 11 years, claims that she never once saw him act inappropriately

 

 

Hillary’s Top Staff: “She has begun to hate everyday Americans”

In email after email after email we have seen a contempt from Hillary’s inner circle aimed at regular people they are supposed to be serving.

One thing I will never forget about the progressive left in college is that they truly believed that they were born to rule “the rabble.” Remember that old man who stood up to Loki and said, “There are ALWAYS men like you,” well it’s true.

This email exchange is between John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign chairman and Jennifer Palmieri, her communications director.

podesta-palmieri-hillary-email-hate-americans

CBS News4 Investigation Finds Dead Voters Casting Ballots In Colorado

Absentee ballots come to the dead person’s address and someone fills them out.

Denver CBS Local:

A CBS4 investigation has found multiple cases of dead men and women voting in Colorado months and in some cases years after their deaths, a revelation that calls into question safeguards designed to prevent such occurrences.

“We do believe there were several instances of potential vote fraud that occurred,” said Colorado Secretary of State Wayne Williams after reviewing the CBS4 findings. “It shows there is the potential for fraud.”

The cases of dead men and women casting ballots ranged from El Paso County in southern Colorado to Denver and Jefferson County. CBS4 discovered the fraudulent voting by comparing databases of voting histories in Colorado against a federal death database.

The CBS4 investigation has triggered criminal investigations in El Paso and Jefferson counties along with a broad investigation by the Colorado Secretary of State’s office.

One of the most glaring cases was that of Sara Sosa in Colorado Springs. She died on Oct. 14, 2009. However, CBS4 uncovered voting records that showed ballots cast for Sosa in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Her husband, Miguel, died on Sept. 26, 2008. But CBS4 unearthed records showing that a vote was cast in his name the next year, 2009.

Read more HERE.

Uncovered Vote Fraud in Philadelphia: “Just the tip of the iceberg”

Lifezette:

At least 86 non-citizens have been registered voters in Philadelphia since 2013, and almost half — 40 — even voted in at least one recent election, according to a legal group that sued to get voter registration records.

Joseph Vanderhulst, an attorney with the Public Interest Legal Foundation, noted Philadelphia knows about those 86 illegal voters only because officials received specific requests — in almost every case from the voters themselves — to remove the names from the rolls. He said there is no way to know how many non-citizens might be registered to vote in Philadelphia, let alone in the rest of politically crucial Pennsylvania.

“This is just the tip of the iceberg,” he said. “Who knows how many are on and don’t ask to be taken off?

Research by the law firm also indicated that Philadelphia makes no effort to proactively remove non-citizens or incarcerated felons, who also are ineligible to vote under Pennsylvania law. Philadelphia becomes the latest jurisdiction that the Public Interest Legal Foundation has revealed to have irregularities in the voter rolls. The group recently found 1,046 non-citizens who had been registered to vote in eight Virginia counties and that nearly 200 cast ballots between 2005 and 2015.

Police Raid Offices of Indiana Voter Registration Project in Vote Fraud Case

Vote fraud in Indiana is a real problem. There are lots of ways to do it. Having worked polling places myself I had to keep an aye on the Democrat poll sheriff who carried opened absentee ballots in her hand for over seven hours with a pen in her hand. She was trying to spoil ballots of people who voted Republican before she put them into the machine. I made it very clear that I was hovering over her while she had those ballots in her hand.

Indiana has recently passed voter ID laws, which Democrats have fought tooth and nail and that will help.

Via Gateway Pundit and USA Today:

It is not clear who established or funded the Indiana Voter Registration Project. However, the group released a statement through spokeswoman Christy Setzer, whose PR firm’s website says she has worked as a Democratic strategist for the presidential campaigns of Al Gore, Howard Dean and Chris Dodd.

That is an easy one, we know through previous press reports and the Hillary campaign leaked emails that these fake voter registration groups are funded by George Soros, who is the Democratic Party’s number one sugar daddy. As you can see they certain are connected.

USA Today:

Indiana State Police investigators on Tuesday searched a voter registration agency on Indianapolis’ north side as they look into a voter fraud case that spans nine counties.

The investigation began in late August when police learned of the filing of fraudulent voter registration forms in Marion and Hendricks counties.

The investigation has expanded from Marion and Hendricks counties to include Allen, Delaware, Hamilton, Hancock, Johnson, Lake and Madison counties, according to a statement from State Police.

Police said the growing number of involved counties leads investigators to believe that the number of fraudulent records might be in the hundreds.

The possible fraudulent information is a combination of fake names, addresses and dates of birth with real information.

Now the investigation has spread to 56 counties.

 

 

mm

Connecticut State Representative Arrested for Voting 19 times

christina-tita-ayala-conn-state-lawmaker-voted-19-times
Democrat State Representative Christina Ayala

Via True the Vote:

Charges against the Bridgeport Democrat include eight felony counts of fraudulent voting:

State Rep. Christina “Tita” Ayala, D-Bridgeport, was arrested Friday on 19 voting fraud charges.  Ayala, 31, is accused of voting in local and state elections in districts she did not live, the Chief State’s Attorney’s Office said in a press release.

The State Elections Enforcement Commission also recommended Ayala’s mother, Democratic Registrar of Voters Santa Ayala, be criminally prosecuted for election fraud, but no charges were filed against her as of Friday.

 

10 Cases of Very Real Vote Fraud

Via The Washington Times:

1. Dead people voting in Colorado.

A CBS affiliate’s evidence of voter fraud in Colorado in September sparked an immediate investigation by Secretary of State Wayne Williams. A report in Denver exposed multiple incidents in recent years where dead Coloradans were still voting. A dead World War II veteran named John Grosso voted in a 2006 primary election, and a woman named Sara Sosa who died in 2009 cast ballots in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Mrs. Sosa’s husband Miguel died in 2008, but a vote was cast in his name one year later.

2. Illegals found voting in Virginia; only discovered after they self-reported.

A study by the watchdog Public Interest Legal Foundation found in just eight Virginia counties, 1,046 alien non-citizens successfully registered to vote. These aliens were only accidentally caught because when they renewed their driver’s license and self-reported, telling authorities they were a non-citizen. This study doesn’t even include the metropolises of Fairfax County and Arlington. Moreover, the FBI opened an investigation in the state after 20 dead people turned in applications to vote.

3. Some Pennsylvania citizens voting twice.

Last year, Pennsylvania’s secretary of state admitted data showed more than 700 Pennsylvania voters might have cast two ballots in recent elections, yet said she’s powerless to investigate or prosecute double voters.

Nearly 43,000 voters in Pennsylvania had potentially duplicate registrations in either Pennsylvania or other states, data researcher Voter Registration Data Crosscheck found.

4. Illegal voters uncovered in Philadelphia; half had previously voted.

At least 86 non-citizens have been registered voters in Philadelphia since 2013, and almost half of them have cast a ballot in a recent election, watchdog Public Interest Legal Foundation noted this month. The number was only turned up after officials received specific requests from the voters themselves to remove their names from the rolls.

“This is just the tip of the iceberg,” Joseph Vanderhulst, the watchdog’s attorney, told LifeZette on Oct. 5. “Who knows how many are on and don’t ask to be taken off?”

5. Voter rigging triggers probe in Texas.

This week, allegations of voter fraud in Tarrant County, Texas, prompted a state investigation. The suit focuses on mail-in ballots, which allows for people to vote from their homes without any ID or verification of identity. There’s concern of so-called “vote-harvesting” were political operatives fill out and return other people’s ballots, without their consent.

6. Indiana voter fraud investigation grows to 56 counties.

According to a local NBC report, Indiana State Police are in the midst of a statewide investigation into possible voter registration fraud.

“Police believe there could be hundreds of fraudulent voter registration records with different combinations of made up names and addresses with people’s real information,” NBC 12 reported.

The police encourage victims of suspected voter fraud to report it to Indiana’s secretary of state.

Read the rest HERE.

Former DoJ Lawyer: 4 Million Dead People on US Voter Rolls. Obama Stonewalling Cleanup Efforts.

J. Christian Adams is a former Department of Justice Civil Rights Division attorney whose job it was to make sure that the vote was honest. After he retired he founded The Election Law Center.

Adams says that the Obama Administration works against efforts to have an honest vote and stopping the dead from voting.

BUSTED! Top Democrat Operatives On Hidden Camera in Massive Vote Fraud Scheme (VIDEO)

Bussing in people to vote illegally. How do you do it? Well there are several ways.
You canvas people who have recently died or moved. You also identify voters who are registered to vote because of motor voter legislation but rarely show up to vote. You make a list of those people and you bus people from polling place to polling place, tell them to identify themselves as said person to vote for them.

Related: Video: Hillary Campaign staffers brag about breaking election laws. “What ever you can get away with, just do it.”

Undercover Video: Violent Agitators On Hillary’s Payroll, Blamed Bernie!

Or in this case, the scheme was to set up illegal Hispanic day laborers with an address and a pay stub from a company created just to enable the fraud so that they can register to vote illegally  in states where an address and a pay stub with your address on it is all you need for proof. Then have others vote for them later.

James O’Keefe from Project Veritas has the hidden camera video where it all unfolds. In the video you see top DNC operatives like Scott Foval, Deputy Director of People for the American Way, a DNC think tank, and Bob Creamer, husband of Congressman Jan Schakowsky (D-ILL).

“We’ve been bussing people in to deal with you f*****g assholes for fifty years, and we’re not going to stop now, we’re just going to find a different way of doing it.” – Scott Foval

UPDATE – Hillary Campaign and DNC emails substantiate the video. Bob Creamer is shown in multiple DNC emails about events where they are sending agitators:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8350

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/3934

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11077

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8282

Bob Creamer is also well know to John Podesta, the Chairman of Hillary’s Campaign. Look at this list of email exchanges HERE.

Creamer also met with Obama 339 times

!

Newt Gingrich points out that organized vote fraud and political violence are federal crimes. Where is the FBI?

UPDATE Video III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Involvement –

NOTE – The video also shows illegal coordination between the Clinton Campaign, the DNC and a SuperPAC.

Bret Baier reports on the illegalities revealed:

Conservative Groups Win Major Court Victory Against IRS

American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ):

Three years after we filed a lawsuit on their behalf, and for some, nearly seven years after they submitted their applications for tax-exempt status, the grassroots conservative groups that were targeted by the IRS for their political views are finally receiving some of the relief to which they have long been entitled—determinations on those applications.

In early August, the federal appellate court for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the plaintiffs who filed suit in Linchpins of Liberty, et al. v. United States, et al. in 2013 had set forth allegations sufficient to obtain actual evidence about the IRS’s targeting of conservative tax-exempt applicants based on their names and political positions. The D.C. Circuit thus reversed the decision of the district court (which had previously dismissed the claims on the grounds that the IRS had apparently ceased the targeting conduct) and sent the case back to the lower court, explaining that the IRS had failed to demonstrate that either the targeting scheme, or its effects on plaintiffs, had actually ended.

Last week, District Judge Reggie B. Walton held a status conference to resume the lower court proceedings in the case. While the IRS’s attorney once again took the position that most of the claims are moot because most of the plaintiff organizations have received determinations, the court picked up where the D.C. Circuit left off, and ordered that the IRS cease delaying determinations on any outstanding tax-exempt applications of Tea Party groups and other grassroots organizations. He gave the IRS thirty days to comply.

It will be seven years this December since one of our clients awaiting a final determination – Albuquerque Tea Party – submitted its tax-exempt application. Another client – Unite in Action – has been waiting six and a half years since filing its application in May 2010. As a result of Judge Walton’s order, these years-long application processes are finally concluding, and the organizations are receiving the review and determinations they deserve. This is a major victory.

Judge Walton also agreed with our position, affirmed by the appellate court, that the IRS cannot obtain dismissal of the case simply by issuing the remaining determinations but must also produce evidence showing that any negative effects of the targeting on plaintiffs have been completely and irrevocably eradicated. Specifically, we urged, and the court agreed, the IRS must answer such questions as: What was the determination process prior to the targeting? How and why did the targeting begin? What treatment did plaintiffs’ applications receive during the targeting? What assurances are currently in place that plaintiffs will not suffer further retaliation or discriminatory treatment at the hands of the IRS?

As a result of this order, the IRS will, at long last, be required to disclose the details of the lawless and unconstitutional Tea Party targeting scheme. The court’s requirement that the IRS give account for its conduct is a tacit acknowledgment that plaintiffs—as well as the American public—deserve honesty and transparency from their government.

We are pleased that the court has taken this first step and look forward to a resolution of this case that will hopefully include the first judicial acknowledgment of the unmistakably unconstitutional nature of the IRS’s egregious political targeting of U.S. citizens.

Since 2013, the ACLJ has represented more than 41 groups from 22 states across the country in our lawsuits against the IRS. Today, we represent 38 groups in federal court, seeking to hold the IRS and Obama Administration officials accountable.

Stand with us today and sign the petition to End the IRS Abuse here.

Star Wars: The Case That Finn is Force Sensitive & Awakens Before Rey (video)

In taking a small break from all of the bad news of just how corrupt the Democratic Party has become, thank you WikiLeaks, I ran across this brilliantly stated and edited video making the case that Finn is indeed a Force sensitive. It seems to me that the author proves his case beyond reasonable doubt.

The fan created video also makes the case that the “awakening” that Snoke detects is Finn and not Rey as he claims that Rey awakens later. I disagree with this because Ray learns to fly and repair the Millenium Falcon like a pro almost instantly, even for an experienced mechanic, and likely used the Force to look into the future for the knowledge she needs.

Finn has tested to be a gifted combatant, resists storm-trooper conditioning, and is among the top 1% of all storm-troopers as far as scoring, showing that he has been using the Force to a degree for some time.

For those dedicated Star Wars fans, it also seems clear that Rey is a “Force Bonder.” This means that she easily creates bonds or links with people using the force and as such she can feel what they feel and know what they know. Rey is also more powerful in the Force herself when she is near other Force Sensitives. Force Bonders tend to be more powerful with The Force than typical Jedi or Dark Side users.

Hillary Campaign Email: Avoid Talking Israel, Foreign Policy Topics in Public

“Because only Republican voters elevate foreign policy….” and even though it is not stated directly, it is implied accurately, that many activist Democrats are hostile to Israel.

The email exchange is among Hillary’s top staff. A key section is below:

mook-hillary-podesta-email-israel-fp

In this email exchange Hillary’s top staff they reveal that they are well aware that the peace process is a Potemkin(fake)process for optics only.

Obama Cut Off WikiLeaks’ Internet to Protect Hillary, But WikiLeaks Was Prepared

The Obama Administration had current Secretary of State John Kerry asked Ecuador to cut off his access to the internet, but it made no difference.

McClatchy News:

Wikileaks said Tuesday that Secretary of State John Kerry asked Ecuador to stop WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, from publishing leaked emails that could disrupt peace negotiations with a guerrilla group in Colombia.

Assange, who has been in refuge in Ecuador’s embassy in London for more than four years, saw his access to the internet cut over the weekend.

 

Democrat Congressman: DoJ, FBI Decided ‘No Matter What’ Clinton Would Not be Held Accountable for Her Crimes

There aren’t that many of them, but there are a very few politicians who actually believe the values they profess. Congressman Dennis Kucinich is one of them.

Congressman Kucinich (D-OH):

“I think the issues that Catherine Herridge has raised and that Judge Napolitano has raised are compelling. If you look at Andrew McCarthy’s piece in the National Review, he made it clear that this is a very political process, having very little to do with the scales of justice, and having everything to do with the 2016 presidential election. The Justice Department and the FBI are inevitably a part of the executive branch of government, and the executive branch of government made an early determination that no matter what came up, that there was no way that Hillary Clinton was going to have to be accountable under law to — for anything dealing with the mishandling of classified information.”

“I will say, it is distressing to see the politicization of the justice system, and the attempt by people in the State Department to try to shade the classified document process in favor of an outcome during the period in which these records were being subpoenaed.”

Hillary’s Paid Private Wall Street Speeches: You are the smartest people. Help us to regulate yourselves…

In the last debate, and for decades really the Democrats, Hillary Clinton in-particular, has promised to reign in Wall Street and stop their excesses. She make sit look like Wall Street fears her. The truth is that they overwhelmingly fund her and as these speech transcripts from her own campaign emails via WikiLeaks she has a very cozy relationship with them.

Read the speeches for yourself HERE.

Yahoo News:

In October 2013, the transcripts show, Clinton told bankers she had “great relations” and worked closely with Wall Street as New York’s senator, and said “the jury is still out” on whether the Dodd-Frank financial reforms put in place after the financial crisis had been the right approach. She said more openness from the start could have prevented the uproar on Wall Street over those reforms.

“What happened, how did it happen, how do we prevent it from happening? You guys help us figure it out, and let’s make sure that we do it right this time,” she said.

Working to relate her speech to her audience, Clinton in one speech likened her experience as secretary of state to business and finance, saying “it’s like anybody’s balance sheet,” with both opportunities and potential liabilities. In one exchange, a conference participant from Texas told Clinton that she had “the honor to raise money for you” during her 2008 presidential campaign.

Clinton responded, “You are the smartest people.”

 

64.7 MILLION Non-English Speakers in USA

immigrants-in-u-s-1

In order to be economically viable you must speak English. It isn’t “racism”, it is rather, an economic necessity.

Democrats have imported a new dependency class that has not been Americanized and won’t be after what the left and Common Core have done to public education. Eventually you gety what is happening in Europe, Balkanization.

WND:

The report by the Center for Immigration Studies, which breaks down new Census data, shows a record number of new immigrants in the country whose primary language is not English, and the fastest growing language is Arabic.

In 2015 a record 64.7 million U.S. residents spoke a foreign language at home – up 5.2 million since 2010 and up 1.5 million in just the last year. The largest percentage increase from 2010 to 2015 was for speakers of Arabic, Hindi (an India language) and Urdu (Pakistan’s national language).

More than one in five U.S. residents now speaks a foreign language at home, according to the CIS report.

 

Powerline: Never forget the liberal media runs a smear campaign every election cycle.

Thanks to leaked emails form the DNC and the Hillary for President Campaign we now know that scores of elite media reporters essentially work for them, coordinate with them, and even submit their stories to them for approval before handing them over to their editors.

Some are pretending that two weeks before an election stories of women claiming they were groped by the Republican candidate is some how something new. The allegations against Herman Can who ran for president in 2012 were demonstrated to be false and orchestrated by David Axelrod, Barack Obama’s campaign manager.

Powerline takes us in a short trip through memory lane:

Today’s news is dominated by claims that years ago, Donald Trump made crude comments about women, or inappropriately touched women, or intruded into a women’s dressing room, and so on. Gone from the campaign are such issues as the economy, Obamacare, national security and immigration. As Election Day approaches, the news is all Trump scandals, all the time.

Some will say–I may have said–that Republican primary voters asked for it by nominating a man with obvious personal vulnerabilities, instead of a more upright (and more electable) Marco Rubio, John Kasich, Ted Cruz or whoever.

But what’s a Republican to do? Last cycle, we nominated the ultimate Boy Scout: Mitt Romney. Whatever you think of Romney from a policy perspective, he is as admirable a man as you will ever meet. To find a presidential candidate of better moral character, you probably have to go back to Abraham Lincoln and George Washington. Romney never said a rude word about a woman in his life.

So what happened? Did Romney and the GOP get credit in the press for the candidates’s outstanding character? No. Romney, who helped to create tens of thousands of jobs at Bain Capital, was denounced as a “vulture capitalist” and blamed, absurdly, for one woman’s developing cancer. The Washington Post made a front page story of the fact that 50 years earlier, when he was in high school, he and others had cut a classmate’s hair. Oh, and Romney was a racist, too. Does anyone remember why? I don’t.

The cycle before that, GOP voters nominated John McCain. McCain is a great patriot, a man of extraordinary character and courage who survived years of torture and abuse as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. Did the liberal media give Republicans credit for nominating such a hero? No. The New York Times, to its everlasting shame, peddled a false rumor that McCain had an affair with a lobbyist. (Bill Clinton would have done that before breakfast.) It also berated McCain for failing to release his medical records–which, actually, he did, unlike Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

The Left’s permanent smear campaign against conservatives doesn’t just extend to Republican presidential candidates. Recall how the Democrat/media complex treated the Tea Party. Prominent House Democrats lied, disgracefully: they claimed, falsely, that Tea Party activists at a protest in Washington had hurled racial insults at black Democrats like John Lewis. The press ate it up. They printed the Democrats’ lies as facts, and to this day reporters and editors have never corrected the libel, even though a $100,000 prize to anyone who could substantiate the Democrats’ lies went unclaimed.

Read more : http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/10/the-liberal-medias-perpetual-smear-campaign.php

 

Hillary Campaign Manager: We Need To Keep Wall Street Billionaire George Soros “Happy”

Thanks to WikiLeaks and the carelessness to witch Hillary and her crew spread information we have learned just how far their tentacles go into crime, Wall Street, academia, the press corps etc. There is no real line where the Democratic Party ends and these other institutions begin.

One of the biggest institutions is billionaire George Soros, who funds dozens of far left foundations, pressure groups, think tanks, SuperPAC’s and media and ties them all, sometimes illegally, into the Democratic Party machine. He is, for Democrats, sugar daddy number one.

Soros is into it all, banking, hedge funds, finance etc but his big ones are currency manipulation and destabilizing governments. In short he gets rich while he makes millions poor.

In this email, Soros summons Hillary Clinton to one of his far left voter registration (and fake voter registration) groups this one being called America Votes:

Hi Huma (and Lona): It was wonderful to see you last week. Thanks so much again for making the time in a very, very busy week. Attached is an invitation for Secretary Clinton to join us at an evening reception at the home of George Soros in December.

We would be thrilled to have her serve as honored guest and speaker at this gathering of our top supporters honoring America Votes’ work over the past 10 years and looking forward to the next decade. Thanks so much in advance for your and the Secretary’s consideration of this request.

We are now holding dates at Mr. Soros’ home in the middle of the month (Dec. 15-17) and hope we can find a mutually agreeable date during that window if possible or an alternative. Please let us know if we can provide any further information, address any questions, etc.

Thanks very much again and look forward to talking again soon.

In the email between Robby Mook, campaign manager, Huma Abedin, Hillary’s personal assistant, and John Podesta, Hillary’s Campaign Chair discuss the event but one thing is clear, make George Soros happy:

mook-keep-soros-happy-email-hillary-podesta

Hillary doesn’t want to reign in Wall Street, as we have learned in many ways from her own emails, she is Wall Street.

Center for Public Integrity: Elite Media Journalists Shower Hillary /w Campaign Cash

The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) deserves some credit. They started out in 1989 as a left leaning outfit who let partisanship get the better of them. They take money from George Soros and Arianna Huffington sits on the board of directors.  But as time went on the quality of their work has improved.

Today they called out left wing media bias and corruption of those “journalists” who are in the tank for the Democrats. It should be noted that they are not talking about partisan talking heads or talk radio hosts, they are talking about Journalists who fly the flag of “objectivity” when they are in reality quite the opposite.

CPI:

New Yorker television critic Emily Nussbaum, a newly minted Pulitzer Prize winner, spent the Republican National Convention pen-pricking presidential nominee Donald Trump as a misogynist shyster running an “ugly and xenophobic campaign.”

What Nussbaum didn’t disclose in her dispatches: she contributed $250 to Democrat Hillary Clinton in April.

On the nation’s left coast, Les Waldron, an Emmy Award-winning assignment editor at television station KFMB, the CBS affiliate in San Diego, swung right in July, shooting $28 to Trump.

And Carole Simpson, a former ABC “World News Tonight” anchor who in 1992 became the first African-American woman to moderate a presidential debate, is not moderate about her personal politics: the current Emerson College distinguished journalist-in-residence and regular TV news guest hasgiven Clinton $2,800.

Conventional journalistic wisdom holds that reporters and editors are referees on politics’ playing field — bastions of neutrality who mustn’t root for Team Red or Team Blue, either in word or deed.

But during this decidedly unconventional election season, during which “the media” has itself become a prominent storyline, several hundred news professionals have aligned themselves with Clinton or Trump by personally donating money to one or the other.

In all, people identified in federal campaign finance filings as journalists, reporters, news editors or television news anchors — as well as other donors known to be working in journalism — have combined to give more than $396,000 to the presidential campaigns of Clinton and Trump, according to aCenter for Public Integrity analysis.

Nearly all of that money — more than 96 percent — has benefited Clinton: About 430 people who work in journalism have, through August, combined to give about $382,000 to the Democratic nominee, the Center for Public Integrity’s analysis indicates.

About 50 identifiable journalists have combined to give about $14,000 to Trump. (Talk radio ideologues, paid TV pundits and the like — think former Trump campaign manager-turned-CNN commentator Corey Lewandowski — are not included in the tally.)