Morning Joe on MSNBC doing a post-mortem over Hillary losing the election. His focus is in the wrong headed media reaction and how they just don’t get it.
Category Archives: Propaganda
Milo Yiannopoulos “Why are you so mean?”(video)
The left and anyone who has an agenda when they ask this question really are complaining about why you have to be so accurate.
As a wise man famously said, “To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.”
CNN Accidentally Outs Themselves On Air Using Cameraman as Fake Protester
As we all know, no one is more guilty of journalistic malpractice than CNN. Check out a partial list HERE.
In this video, CNN appears to interview a protester who begs Hillary to sue to get the presidency. Then Don Lemon says, Hey I know that guy, he was my cameraman…
No one said that CNN talent was the brightest.
CNN contributor mocks Trump supporters beaten by Democrat mobs, ‘Oh, my goodness! Poor white people, please!
This is one of the reasons so many people voted for Donald Trump, the elite media has simply gone off the rails in support for the radical left wing. The constant name calling, race baiting, the lies, the dishonest spin, and in many cases simply making stuff up. Thanks to WikiLeaks we now know that dozens of reporters were in direct collusion with Hillary’s campaign.
CNN was the most guilty as they asked the Democrats for negative information on Republicans, let the Democrats write their questions and we know that CNN, somehow someway, provided debate questions to Hillary in advance.
We have all seen the riots, the burning, the attacks, and the violence on television. We know that it is being coordinated by top Democrats including money men such as George Soros (2) who are paying these violent thugs – a tactic Hillary’s campaign used in spades.
Here are the buses the paid thugs came in on just before they started creating a mess in Chicago. Thanks to Zero Hedge for the video:
In the video below CNN’s Symone Sanders plays flippant lip service to how she opposes violence, but when asked about someone who was brutally beaten her true feelings came out loud and proud. Where does CNN find these people?
Donna Brazile Sent More CNN Debate Questions to Clinton in Advance
Just when you thought that the sleaze was coming to an end, round three.
Via WikiLeaks we know know that once again DNC Vice Chair (now chair) Donna Brazile somehow got more of CNN’s debate questions in advance and forwarded them to Hillary’s campaign. The questions were about “Who Built this Nation” and “income inequality.”
Read the email from Donna Brazile to HIllary’s campaign staff HERE.
The Daily Caller on 11/7 reported more details:
Secretary Clinton, yesterday you were in St. Louis, and you talked about carpenters and the rebuilding of the country, the folks who built this nation. And, both you and Senator Sanders have significant union support, yet many of the trade unions that — we walk about built the country, they’ve locked out black folks and other minorities for decades. Would you, even right now, and even as president, call a meeting with the trade unions and say it’s time for you to open up those doors and bring in more African-Americans and Hispanics, and others be because those are high-paying jobs. And, if we keep saying rebuild America with a huge infrastructure and billions of dollars, they’re the ones who are going to do it. And, black folks and others are going to be left on the outside looking in.
Related:
DNC Chair Donna Brazile in internal campaign mails: economy, people in despair…..
Donna Brazile passed along Bernie campaign secrets to Hillary
FLASHBACK: The Fine Art of Poll Rigging to Sway Opinion or ‘Make News’
Flashback: This is what yours truly posted in a Facebook Note March 24. 2016. Even though the explanation below is rock solid, the NeverTrump crowd insisted that the RCP was the ultimate in reliability. Just a little I told you so!
By Chuck Norton, March 24, 2016.
Trump can’t beat Hillary because the polls say so! Look at the Real Clear Politics (RCP) Polling Average! It has Hillary beating Trump across five separate polls!
The way all five of these polls were done is misleading and dishonest. Why? A number of reasons, but most of all because most of the people polled are not even going to vote and have no incentive to be informed enough to do so.
How do we know that?
Because none of the five polls above are of ‘likely voters.’
Why does that matter?
Because of the Motor Voter Law, AKA the National Voter Registration Act, if you get a state ID or a driver’s license you automatically become registered to vote. Most people in fact do not vote.
NOTE: Motor Voter has lead to increased vote fraud. Because voter rolls can be checked to see who does not vote. Absentee ballots can be obtained in the names of those who do not vote and said ballot is cast for them without their knowledge.
Therefore, polls of ‘registered voters’ is only a residue better than polling ‘adults’ – read anyone who will answer the phone.
Have you ever seen Jay Leno ask random people on the street questions about politics or current events and the answers you get back are usually a total farce? The methodology used in these polls really isn’t much better.
In short, if you want to poll people who are the least informed, least likely to vote, the easiest to manipulate with leading questions and who are most likely to regurgitate the elite media narrative that they see on television, these are the people you poll.
The Fox Poll is of ‘registered voters’ – http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int…
The Bloomberg Poll is of ‘adults’ – http://assets.bwbx.io/documents/use…
The Qunniapiac Poll is of ‘registered voters’ – http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/po…
The CBS-NYT Poll is of half ‘registered voters’ and half ‘adults’ – http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-…
The CNN-ORC Poll is of ‘adults’ – https://www.documentcloud.org/docum…
The questions in several of the polls were leading. For example, the Quinnipiac Poll asked if Donald Trump was responsible for the violence that happened in Chicago. Of course this was after a week of the elite media and the other campaigns flooding the airwaves with the message that the violence, which was planned by Move On, BLM and other Soros backed groups was somehow all Trump’s fault, in spite of the fact that the groups admitted that they planned the violence in advance and proudly took credit for it.
This is also why at this time the other Republican candidates are doing better in these same polls vs Hillary Clinton. Ted Cruz and John Kasich are not getting pounded day after day in the elite media as Trump is. If Ted Cruz were to become the front runner the liberal elite media would assault him relentlessly driving his numbers down with those who have a short memory and simply accept and internalize the elite media narrative, most ‘likely voters’ do not fall in this category.
Lastly, it is important to keep in mind that general election polls this early are meaningless. The general election campaign has not even started and those campaign’s do move votes as Ronald Reagan polled far behind Jimmy Carter until late August and then won in a landslide.
UPDATE!! 8-22-2016
In comparing the polls from the RCP average from 2012 to the polls in the RCP average today…..THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE. In 2012 the samples were large and included large numbers of LIKELY VOTERS. You can look at them and see for yourself:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep…
But today the RCP does not use polls of likely voters, many just poll “ADULTS”. The problem is that “”adults”” mostly do not vote and because of motor voter legislation most registered voters do not vote either. These people are the least informed of all of us. They mostly repeat the elite media spin they see on TV back to the pollster. Here is the RCP average from today:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep…
There is only one kind of polling that is worse than polls of “adults” and that is Online Polls. When MSNBC puts up an online poll, who is most likely to respond? Democrats of course. So here is the NBC poll methodology from today’s RCP Poll:
“The NBC News|SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking poll was conducted online August 8 through August 14, 2016 among a national sample of 15,179 adults who say they are registered to vote.”
In short, its a joke.
TV Talking Heads Confidently Predicted Victory for Hillary (video)
Hmmmm, who is it that is in a “thought bubble”?
Emmy Award Winning Reporter John Stossel: Media Myths (Lies) About Donald Trump (video)
As a reporter, John Stossel has received numerous honors including 19 Emmy Awards, and he has been honored five times for excellence in consumer reporting by the National Press Club – Wikipedia.
Prager University: Things to think about before you cast your vote (video)
Short, five minute long videos to help get you informed on key issues.
Can YOU trust the press?
Why do American companies leave America?
This is the double taxation that Donald Trump wants to end.
The dark art of political intimidation.
It goes on much, much more than you know.
CNN & Washington Post asked Democrat Party to write negative talking points to use against Trump and Cruz.
We have been cataloging the collusion between many dozens of members of the elite media with the Clinton Campaign, including reporters submitting their work for approval, CNN leaking debate questions to Hillary in advance, debate moderators coordinating with the Clinton campaign and the list goes on, but this one maybe the biggest one of all as the collusion goes on for some time as revealed by DNC emails made public by WikiLeaks.
Notice that the UK Daily Mail is reporting this in a big way, but the American elite media is near mum.
Among the batch of 8,263 emails released on Sunday night, one shows that staff working for the network hosts asked DNC staffers what questions they should put to the Republican candidate.
They also asked for advice when it came to an appearance from former candidate, Ted Cruz.
An email dated April 28 entitled ‘Cruz on CNN’ reads ‘CNN is looking for questions. Please send some topical/interesting ones.’
That email was sent from DNC research director Lauren Dillon to other officials and staffers.
Days before that, on April 25 she asked for questions from officials and staffers for an interview that CNN’s Wolf Blitzer would be conducting with Trump.
See the emails and more HERE.
Thank you UK Daily Mail.
Flashback: KKK leader endorsed Hillary. Donated $20k. (video)
Obama and Hillary have brought up the KKK this week in an act of desperation. We don’t even bother talking about the KKK here for the simple reason that they have next to no membership and are effectively irrelevant. Let us explain.
Number of people who believe they have been abducted by space aliens – 300,000
Number of people in the Jedi religion – 175,000
Number of people in the Flat Earth Society – 3,500
Number of people in the KKK – less than 3,000.
That said, since the Democrats are bringing up the KKK again it is important to point out that the Klan has always been, and still claims to this day, to be a Democratic Party organization as their leader Will Quig states in the video below.
KKK leader Will Quigg has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president multiple times on video saying he likes her because of her “hidden agenda”. He donated $20,000 to her campaign.
Youtube, in an attempt to censor the story, has turned off sharing of the video, but you can watch in HERE, but in order to see it you have to load the link manually.
Here is another copy of the video:
Clinton Campaign email shows top staff aware Hillary signed off on foreign arms deals in exchange for CGI donations
Hillary, as Secretary of State, sold American uranium to the Russians and signed off on weapons deals to foreign countries, but only after they donated money to the Clinton Foundation (CGI). And even though this story has been reported in the NYT, Washington Post, AP, ABC, and a host of others, the elite media simply reported it and dropped it, thus most people are simply unaware of it.
The United States should not be for sale. Weapons for bribes. How much worse can it get? Even the very left wing Mother Jones reported this story.
Hillary Clinton Oversaw US Arms Deals to Clinton Foundation Donors. An investigation finds that countries that gave to the foundation saw an increase in State Department-approved arms sales.
Now we know from Clinton Campaign emails that Hillary’s top staff and her marketing team were well aware of this corruption and discussed how to make it go away. Read the email for yourself HERE.
Hell Freezes Over: MSNBC Panel Blasts “Clinton Inc.” Corruption & Media Cover Up (video)
You ask someone to watch Fox News saying these things and a Democrat will just laugh it off and refuse to even look at the evidence.
This is the full MSNBC panel, including Mika Brzezinski, calling out the “Clinton Empire” and “Clinton Inc.” for enriching themselves with their “sleazy” relationships to Wall Street and banks.
The entire panel calls out the Clinton’s for millions in pay to play, corruption, and using government power to enrich themselves. The panel also blasts the Clinton’s for literally bragging about it while most of the elite media stays mum.
Watch for yourself:
Elite Media Bashing Trump: Coverage 91% Negative. Hillary Almost Ignored.
Via the Media Research Center:
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has received significantly more broadcast network news coverage than his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, but nearly all of that coverage (91%) has been hostile, according to a new study by the Media Research Center (MRC).
In addition, the networks spent far more airtime focusing on the personal controversies involving Trump (440 minutes) than about similar controversies involving Clinton (185 minutes). Donald Trump’s treatment of women was given 102 minutes of evening news airtime, more than that allocated to discussing Clinton’s e-mail scandal (53 minutes) and the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play scandals (40 minutes) combined.
For this study, the MRC analyzed all 588 evening news stories that either discussed or mentioned the presidential campaign on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from July 29 through October 20 (including weekends).
Trolling, Flogging & Disinformation: Clinton Campaign Doc Gives Instructions to Army of Social Media Trolls
Most people have no idea that politicians, PR firms and corporations pay people to troll the internet. To counter comment those who speak the truth, to put out lies and disinformation, or to post vulgarities in comments to fatigue people into no longer commenting. There is software allowing a single person top control a thousand fake social media accounts. Wikipedia and WebMD are controlled by PR firms as their “official editors” have been caught taking money under the table many times.
Eventually this gave rise to companies who try to undo this damage and we see their commercials of TV. They will try to counter bad publicity about you by generating new publicity that will be optimized by SEO (Search Engine Optimization) so when people search they will see the good news you paid for right on top.
Here we have a document which instructs the campaign’s social media staff to spam Reddit conversation groups with “trolling, flogging, and disinformation”:
Clinton Campaign Email: How to Rig Polls…
The Clinton Campaign hired Atlas Research who makes recommendations to the campaign and the media for how to get the desired result from polling by targeting certain zip codes, minority groups, Spanish only speakers etc.
Why rig a poll? Rigging a poll to make news is desirable for the “band wagon” effect. If people think that “everybody wants Clinton” many people will not want to feel left out, alienated or different so they get on the band wagon.
Thanks to WikiLeaks we know that dozens of elite media journalists are actively coordinating with the Clinton Campaign (2, 3, 4), this is why it is no surprise that so many polls sponsored by the elite media oversample democrats or poll people who aren’t even going to vote to get the desired result.
In this email the Clinton campaign staff discusses how to generate rigged polling for the media. Here is the presentation attached in this email. See for yourself:
Hillary tells donors vetting of Syrian refugees impossible. Obama Admin tells Congress there is no attempt to screen for militant views (video)
Obama promised us in speech after speech that there would be strong accurate vetting so that we do not see the mass immigration violence like has been seen France, Germany, Sweden, Amsterdam etc. His State Department tells Congress the exact opposite.
Watch for yourself:
In the video above Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions asks Simon Henshaw, the Deputy Assistant Secretary at the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migrants of the State Department, “do you make any inquiry about practices that we reject in the United States, like female genital mutilation?” It seems that the Obama Administration thinks that such questions would be rude.
The Daily Caller reports that at least 23 refugees have been implicated in terrorism in the United States since 2010.
Hillary Clinton also told us that we would be safe and there would be strong vetting, but in a private speech to a donor group she said this:
Democrats on House Benghazi Committee Secretly Colluded with Clinton Campaign, Undermined Investigation
Four Americans were killed in Benghazi and dozens injured, secret documents in both our consulate and CIA annex were exposed, national security compromised. It was all avoidable.
We know that in spite of the fact that they asked for better security hundreds of times, Hillary stripped their security from them and Hillary actually hired an offshoot of Al-Qaeda (yes the guys who carried out the 9/11 attacks) to provide security for our consulate.
There is evidence to show that the State Department was using the facility to send weapons to Muslim Brotherhood and pre-ISIS Islamic radicals who were fighting Syrian strongman Bashir Al-Assad. The fewer patriotic Americans on site who would leak such idiocy if they found out about it the better, hence most of the American security was stripped from them…and now they are dead.
[See our previous Benghazi and Libya coverage HERE]
Democrats have said over and over that the Benghazi investigation was purely political. Democrats, along with their friends in the elite media, have said that the attacks have been investigated and resolved.
To this day, thanks to Obama Administration stone walling, most of our Benghazi questions to this day have not been answered:
Thanks to Clinton campaign emails released by WikiLeaks we see very clearly just who was politicizing what rather than working to find the truth. The email:
The Daily Caller summarizes:
New documents released by WikiLeaks in connection with its dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s email indicate that Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi coordinated with David Kendall, Bill and Hillary Clinton’s long time private counsel.
Kendall, of Williams & Connolly, has represented the Clinton’s since 1993, when he was retained in connection with the Whitewater investigation.
“Benghazi Committe Dems want us to know that Gowdy has just quietly signed up to appear live on FTN this Sunday,” Kendall wrote, in reference to Face the Nation, the CBS Sunday morning political program hosted by John Dickerson. “Apparently, R’s were disappointed in how little media pick up the SB email ‘revelations’ got. I’m not sure there’s much we can do but be forewarned,” he continued, in reference to news that Sidney Blumenthal, a long time Clinton confidant who was banned from joining the administration by White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, was advising Mrs. Clinton in an informal capacity.
The email was sent to Jennifer Palmieri, the campaign’s communications director, and Nick Merrill, Clinton’s traveling press secretary. Senior Clinton aides Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, and Katherine Turner were also copied on the message. All three are lawyers who have counseled Clinton throughout the probe of the private email server she maintained during her tenure as Secretary of State. All three were present when she was questioned by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Mills forwarded the email to “hdr29@hrcoffice.com,” the email address Clinton appears to have been using at the time. The address is no longer active.
“Can we do another video w Brian Fallon or another campaign press person debunking it all before he appears so he has to respond?,” Clinton responded. Fallon is a campaign spokesman.
NEWSGATE – Sharyl Attkisson outs dishonest reporters who collude with politicians
While WikiLeaks has given us a partial list of reporters who colluded with the Clinton campaign to help sway the election.
In her lengthy post, veteran CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson outs dishonest reporters by name and is keeping the list updated. She called the scandal NEWSGATE.
The following accounts come from human sources, Freedom of Information Act documents and Wikileaks emails. Obviously, this is just a small sampling of the behind the scenes dealings going on between reporters and their sources.
Continue reading HERE.
Could WikiLeaks emails be faked? Answers here.
By the Editor
Could WikiLeaks emails be fake? In order to make the case that they are fake one would have to overcome the following eight facts and problems.
1 – WikiLeaks has NEVER had to retract a story, document, or publication because it was found to be false or faked. WikiLeaks has exposed millions of documents from various governments for over a decade. They have no track record of doctoring anything, when one reads the emails for oneself, they are compelling.
2 – It is not a crime to invent fake documents and call them classified. The fact that US Government wants Assange for spreading classified intel (mostly stuff that was classified because it was embarrassing) by default means the US Government has confirmed that WikiLeaks documents are genuine.
3 – WikiLeaks is a foreign group, they are not Republicans or Democrats, their agenda is transparency with all governments….and that is the agenda of their donors. To risk losing credibility is to risk losing all funding from their crowd sourcing etc. They have every motivation to keep things on the up & up. Also worthy of note is that Anonymous is a foreign hacker group and they say that Hillary is corrupt.
4 – Most importantly, Hillary and her top staff, according to the State Department IG and FBI, were beyond careless and even contemptuous of national security and communications security protocols – their words not ours. In short, they were begging to get hacked and they did.
5 – Exactly ZERO of the dozens of reporters who were caught unethically coordinating with the Clinton campaign have come out and said the emails are fake.
6 – That said, we are talking about dozens of emails every day from the Clinton Campaign’s staff and the DNC – OVER THE COURSE OF YEARS. No one could manufacture hundreds of thousands fake emails and make it all accurate to the minute with the lives of hundreds of people. If it was fake it would be easy to debunk because no one could know that many details about so many people’s lives on a day to day basis over such a lengthy stretch of time.
7 – Information technology is reasonably secure, the complete emails headers, IT routing information etc, is included with each email at a tab at the top, all of which can be tracked and really is not fakable on a mass scale to this degree. The number of servers and routers that would have to be hacked to insert reams of false data makes this nigh impossible.
8 – Many of the emails in question with the Hillary Campaign, including some of the emails with Donna Brazile, used DKIM authentication which even the NSA might not be able to spoof.
DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is an email authentication method designed to detect email spoofing. It allows the receiver to check that an email claimed to come from a specific domain was indeed authorized by the owner of that domain. It is intended to prevent forged sender addresses in emails, a technique often used in phishing and email spam.
In technical terms, DKIM lets a domain associate its name with an email message by affixing a digital signature to it. Verification is carried out using the signer’s public key published in the DNS. A valid signature guarantees that some parts of the email (possibly including attachments) have not been modified since the signature was affixed.
DNC Chair Donna Brazile Caught Lying Again, Delivered More Debate Questions to Hillary in Advance. Pulls Race Card. CNN Fires.
DNC Chairman Donna Brazile likes to portray herself as a sweet lil’ Christian black lady who cries “PERSECUTION” when her integrity is questioned. Thanks to campaign emails via WikiLeaks we now know that “status” of her integrity beyond all doubt.
What have we discovered?
1 – Donna Brazile, as DNC Vice Chair, leaked Bernie Sanders’ campaign secrets to the Clinton campaign.
2 – While Brazile was tweeting about how fabulous the Obama economy is, she was telling the Clinton campaign that the economy is in despair.
3 – We know that Brazile, when DNC Vice Chair and a CNN employee, got a tough town hall debate question in advance and passed them on to Hillary . She got debate questions in advance from debate moderator Roland Martin. When called on it she denied it and told Megyn Kelly that she was being persecuted by WikiLeaks or the Russians because she is a black woman.
4 – The very left wing and true hater of all things traditional, Salon Magazine (they even published multiple calls for the torture and murder of Sarah Palin), called Donna Brazile out as guilty and published a monetary reward from a security researcher if someone can duplicate such a faked email.
5 – Now we know that Brazile passed on debate questions from another CNN debate as well. Read the email for yourself HERE:
6 – CNN has fired Donna Brazile.
As flawed as we believe Megyn Kelley is, she is right to be outraged by this as Donna Brazile lied to her face:
Donald Trump asks, “Why didn’t Hillary turn in Donna Brazile for handing her the debate questions in advance” – VIDEO.
Could the WikiLeaks emails be faked? As we explained in this post the answer in short is no. It is also worth pointing out that many of the emails in question with the Hillary Campaign, including some of the emails with Donna Brazile, used DKIM authentication which even the NSA might not be able to spoof.
DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is an email authentication method designed to detect email spoofing. It allows the receiver to check that an email claimed to come from a specific domain was indeed authorized by the owner of that domain. It is intended to prevent forged sender addresses in emails, a technique often used in phishing and email spam.
In technical terms, DKIM lets a domain associate its name with an email message by affixing a digital signature to it. Verification is carried out using the signer’s public key published in the DNS. A valid signature guarantees that some parts of the email (possibly including attachments) have not been modified since the signature was affixed.
Clinton Campaign emails: How do we answer when asked about the (illegal) deletions?
The Federal Records Act says that government business on email must be archived on government servers. The Espionage Act says that classified information may not go out on unsecured or unauthorized networks. The law is that once something is under subpoena if you delete it, that is obstruction of justice.
Hillary and her staff did all of this countless times. When asked about it the reflexive answer was not just to simply tell the truth, it was to invent the best possible answer to benefit them. This of course, is also obstruction because they know that the FBI and Congress will be asking these very questions. No indication of just telling the truth is suggested.
You can real the email HERE:
VIDEO: Clinton Campaign appears to feed NBC’s Andrea Mitchell questions via cell-phone
We have seen this before. Hillary Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill gives hand picked questions to friendly reporters.
Thanks to Hillary’s campaign emails being released by Wikileaks we know that a great many reporters, like NBC’s Andrea Mitchell shown here, are advising and coordinating with the campaign to give the most favorable coverage possible.
Obama Cut Off WikiLeaks’ Internet to Protect Hillary, But WikiLeaks Was Prepared
The Obama Administration had current Secretary of State John Kerry asked Ecuador to cut off his access to the internet, but it made no difference.
WASHINGTON – Wikileaks said Tuesday that Secretary of State John Kerry asked Ecuador to stop WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, from publishing leaked emails that could disrupt peace negotiations with a guerrilla group in Colombia.
Assange, who has been in refuge in Ecuador’s embassy in London for more than four years, saw his access to the internet cut over the weekend.
Hillary Campaign Manager: We Need To Keep Wall Street Billionaire George Soros “Happy”
Thanks to WikiLeaks and the carelessness to witch Hillary and her crew spread information we have learned just how far their tentacles go into crime, Wall Street, academia, the press corps etc. There is no real line where the Democratic Party ends and these other institutions begin.
One of the biggest institutions is billionaire George Soros, who funds dozens of far left foundations, pressure groups, think tanks, SuperPAC’s and media and ties them all, sometimes illegally, into the Democratic Party machine. He is, for Democrats, sugar daddy number one.
Soros is into it all, banking, hedge funds, finance etc but his big ones are currency manipulation and destabilizing governments. In short he gets rich while he makes millions poor.
In this email, Soros summons Hillary Clinton to one of his far left voter registration (and fake voter registration) groups this one being called America Votes:
Hi Huma (and Lona): It was wonderful to see you last week. Thanks so much again for making the time in a very, very busy week. Attached is an invitation for Secretary Clinton to join us at an evening reception at the home of George Soros in December.
We would be thrilled to have her serve as honored guest and speaker at this gathering of our top supporters honoring America Votes’ work over the past 10 years and looking forward to the next decade. Thanks so much in advance for your and the Secretary’s consideration of this request.
We are now holding dates at Mr. Soros’ home in the middle of the month (Dec. 15-17) and hope we can find a mutually agreeable date during that window if possible or an alternative. Please let us know if we can provide any further information, address any questions, etc.
Thanks very much again and look forward to talking again soon.
In the email between Robby Mook, campaign manager, Huma Abedin, Hillary’s personal assistant, and John Podesta, Hillary’s Campaign Chair discuss the event but one thing is clear, make George Soros happy:
Hillary doesn’t want to reign in Wall Street, as we have learned in many ways from her own emails, she is Wall Street.
Center for Public Integrity: Elite Media Journalists Shower Hillary /w Campaign Cash
The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) deserves some credit. They started out in 1989 as a left leaning outfit who let partisanship get the better of them. They take money from George Soros and Arianna Huffington sits on the board of directors. But as time went on the quality of their work has improved.
Today they called out left wing media bias and corruption of those “journalists” who are in the tank for the Democrats. It should be noted that they are not talking about partisan talking heads or talk radio hosts, they are talking about Journalists who fly the flag of “objectivity” when they are in reality quite the opposite.
CPI:
New Yorker television critic Emily Nussbaum, a newly minted Pulitzer Prize winner, spent the Republican National Convention pen-pricking presidential nominee Donald Trump as a misogynist shyster running an “ugly and xenophobic campaign.”
What Nussbaum didn’t disclose in her dispatches: she contributed $250 to Democrat Hillary Clinton in April.
On the nation’s left coast, Les Waldron, an Emmy Award-winning assignment editor at television station KFMB, the CBS affiliate in San Diego, swung right in July, shooting $28 to Trump.
And Carole Simpson, a former ABC “World News Tonight” anchor who in 1992 became the first African-American woman to moderate a presidential debate, is not moderate about her personal politics: the current Emerson College distinguished journalist-in-residence and regular TV news guest hasgiven Clinton $2,800.
Conventional journalistic wisdom holds that reporters and editors are referees on politics’ playing field — bastions of neutrality who mustn’t root for Team Red or Team Blue, either in word or deed.
But during this decidedly unconventional election season, during which “the media” has itself become a prominent storyline, several hundred news professionals have aligned themselves with Clinton or Trump by personally donating money to one or the other.
In all, people identified in federal campaign finance filings as journalists, reporters, news editors or television news anchors — as well as other donors known to be working in journalism — have combined to give more than $396,000 to the presidential campaigns of Clinton and Trump, according to aCenter for Public Integrity analysis.
Nearly all of that money — more than 96 percent — has benefited Clinton: About 430 people who work in journalism have, through August, combined to give about $382,000 to the Democratic nominee, the Center for Public Integrity’s analysis indicates.
About 50 identifiable journalists have combined to give about $14,000 to Trump. (Talk radio ideologues, paid TV pundits and the like — think former Trump campaign manager-turned-CNN commentator Corey Lewandowski — are not included in the tally.)
Hillary Campaign Emails Reveal Plot to Trash Clinton’s Female Accusers: “the Slimefest”
Hillary said that women who claim to have been abused deserve to be believed. To that we say sure, unless they turn out to be false.
The difference between Clinton’s accusers as opposed to the Trump accusers is that the Clinton accusers have been corroborated. They have been not just investigated by the press, complete with witnesses some of which were on the Clinton’s security detail, but they have been investigated by the courts and the House of Representatives. Bill Clinton lost his law licence and had to pay a large settlement to accusers like Paul Jones.
The Trump accusers, as you can see by our coverage and others, is that the accusers stories are not substantiated, with most already falling apart. Witnesses they claimed would back them have done the opposite, key facts of their story ended up being incorrect and one accuser even fashioned her accusation using the lyrics of a song. Even the Huffington Post is reporting these with skepticism warning that the accusers stories are not substantiated.
Herman Cain, who ran in 2012 had several women accuse him and their stories fell apart. Come to find out that they were paid and had close ties to Obama’s campaign manager David Axelrod, one even lived in the same building.
Here we have an email dated January 7, 2016 between Bill Clinton’s Attorney David Kendall, Hillary’s Campaign Chairman John Podesta, Hillary’s, Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri, Deputy Communications Director Christina Reynolds, and her Press Secretary and former Obama Justice Department Press Secretary Brian Fallon.
The email has attached documents from David Kendall with opposition research on rape victim Juanita Broaddrick and Kendall ends the email with “Please let me know if there is anything else I can provide about this slimefest”:
Politico Chief Correspondent sends work to Clinton Campaign for approval “I’m a hack”
Politico’s Chief Political Correspondent is Glenn Thrush, and like so many other reporters from the NYT, Boston Globe, AP and television, he submits his work to the Hillary Campaign for approval, even going so far as to admit “I have become a hack”. Well welcome to a pretty large club in the elite media Glenn.
Have you noticed that exactly ZERO of the reporters caught in this scandal have been fired?
In the email he asks if he effed up anything and admits he is a hack and below is his submitted article:
Matt Drudge Quote of the Year
Our tag line at the top of the page is a quote from Malcolm X:
“If you are not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
In that spirit Matt Drudge hits a home run for both reason and brevity:
Clinton Campaign Colluded /w State Department and Associated Press to Undermine House Benghazi Committee
As if the previous revelations from the Clinton Campaign’s own emails weren’t solid proof enough to show how the elite media and the Obama Administration colluded to commit perjury and obstruction, this email chain is especially damning.
It shows Hillary Clinton’s staff attorney Cheryl Mills actively working back and forth with the State Department and the Associated Press (AP) to get everyone on the same page as far as the talking points and the story (read lies) they are going to tell. It also shows that they knew they were not turning over all of the subpoenaed emails.
Read the email for yourself HERE. This is a key section:
Political Arena 