Stuart Varney asks, do we want this in the White House again?
Category Archives: Clinton
Associated Press Asks Clinton Campaign If They Should Steer Away From Email Investigation Story
Thanks to WikiLeaks we have dozens of emails showing reporters willing to do the bidding of the campaign, edit their stories, change quotes and we now know that debate moderators gave Clinton debate questions in advance. This is just the latest example:
Associated Press “journalist” Eric Tucker is willing to be ‘steered away’ from a story about Clinton’s emails. See the email for yourself HERE:

Survey Shows Trump Voters Have More Political Knowledge
A new survey provides evidence that supporters of Donald Trump tend to be more knowledgeable than Hillary Clinton supporters.
The survey, conducted by Conquest Communications Group and published by Just Facts, asked respondents 23 questions regarding education, taxes, spending, national debt, global warming, pollution, energy, hunger, Social Security and health care. Overall, the success rate for Trump supporters in correctly answering the questions was 43 percent, compared to only 31 percent for Clinton supporters.
In total, the rates at which voters gave the correct answers varied from a high of 43% for Trump voters to a low of 31% for Clinton voters:
- 43% for Trump voters.
- 37% for 35 to 64 year olds.
- 37% for males.
- 35% for undecided voters.
- 34% for females.
- 34% for 65+ year olds.
- 31% for Clinton voters.
Hell Freezes Over: MSNBC Panel Blasts “Clinton Inc.” Corruption & Media Cover Up (video)
You ask someone to watch Fox News saying these things and a Democrat will just laugh it off and refuse to even look at the evidence.
This is the full MSNBC panel, including Mika Brzezinski, calling out the “Clinton Empire” and “Clinton Inc.” for enriching themselves with their “sleazy” relationships to Wall Street and banks.
The entire panel calls out the Clinton’s for millions in pay to play, corruption, and using government power to enrich themselves. The panel also blasts the Clinton’s for literally bragging about it while most of the elite media stays mum.
Watch for yourself:
Hillary’s Top Staff on Her Illegal Email Server, “There Is Just No Good Answer”
Democrats say that this email thing is “just BS” and here is why.
In spite of the fact that we are literally talking about hundreds of thousands of violations of the Federal Records Act. We are also talking about, with her mishandling of classified material, at least hundreds of violations of the Espionage Act.
Hillary revealed classified places, persons and methodology in her emails and it is likely that one CIA asset in Iran was executed as a result. People do not plead the 5th Amendment in mass over “just BS.”
We also know that her server was hacked at least 5 times. That could mean that foreign countries have blackmail material on the possible next President of these United States.
This email exchange happens shortly after the New York Times reported that she had an illegal email server with possible classified information.
“There is just no good answer,” Clinton aide Philippe Reines tells campaign chair John Podesta in a panicked mail from March 2015 in which they discuss Clinton’s reasoning for using a private email server. Also included in the email chain is her staff lawyer Cheryl Mills and her communications director Jennifer Palmieri.
James Comey said in July that they had no intent to do wrong, this sets the truth to that lie.
Via WikiLeaks read the email for yourself HERE.

Elite Media Bashing Trump: Coverage 91% Negative. Hillary Almost Ignored.
Via the Media Research Center:
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has received significantly more broadcast network news coverage than his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, but nearly all of that coverage (91%) has been hostile, according to a new study by the Media Research Center (MRC).
In addition, the networks spent far more airtime focusing on the personal controversies involving Trump (440 minutes) than about similar controversies involving Clinton (185 minutes). Donald Trump’s treatment of women was given 102 minutes of evening news airtime, more than that allocated to discussing Clinton’s e-mail scandal (53 minutes) and the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play scandals (40 minutes) combined.
For this study, the MRC analyzed all 588 evening news stories that either discussed or mentioned the presidential campaign on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from July 29 through October 20 (including weekends).


Trolling, Flogging & Disinformation: Clinton Campaign Doc Gives Instructions to Army of Social Media Trolls
Most people have no idea that politicians, PR firms and corporations pay people to troll the internet. To counter comment those who speak the truth, to put out lies and disinformation, or to post vulgarities in comments to fatigue people into no longer commenting. There is software allowing a single person top control a thousand fake social media accounts. Wikipedia and WebMD are controlled by PR firms as their “official editors” have been caught taking money under the table many times.
Eventually this gave rise to companies who try to undo this damage and we see their commercials of TV. They will try to counter bad publicity about you by generating new publicity that will be optimized by SEO (Search Engine Optimization) so when people search they will see the good news you paid for right on top.
Here we have a document which instructs the campaign’s social media staff to spam Reddit conversation groups with “trolling, flogging, and disinformation”:

Australia: Gun Crime Way Up After Gun Bans
The left always says that taking away your ability to defend yourself withe effective means is about YOUR safety and about stopping crime. How many crimes have been committed with YOUR guns? Exactly. It is like trying to stop drunk driving by taking cars away from people who don’t drink. Yet, some people are just plain foolish enough and historically ignorant enough to believe such Orwellian propaganda.
Australia elected a leftist government and it happened. In the name of “climate change” the Australian economy was trashed and the government confiscated most guns from civilians who never harmed anyone.
The result:
On Friday, the government of gun-controlled Australia admitted that hundreds of thousands of “illegal firearms” remain in criminal possession and launched a new amnesty in hopes of persuading said criminals to turn over the weapons.
In September, Breitbart News reported that Melbourne, Australia, had a gun problem; that they had witnessed more than one shooting a week on average since January 2015.
Moreover, The Age reported:
- Known criminals were caught with firearms 755 times [in 2015], compared to 143 times in 2011
- Criminals are using gunshot wounds to the arms and legs as warnings to pay debts
- Assault rifles and handguns are being smuggled into Australia via shipments of electronics and metal parts
Now the government of Australia is admitting that hundreds of thousands of “illegal guns”–i.e., “illicit firearms”–are in the hands of criminals some 20 years after Australia’s gun ban was implemented. And Reuters reports an amnesty will be put in place in 2017 where those in possession of said weapons can turn them in with no questions asked.
Yes indeed, they will beg the criminals to hand over their guns……
Hillary Clinton Armed Jihadist Groups to Undermine Secular Middle East Governments (video)
On October 25th 2012 this very writer made a lengthy case that the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton at the State Department, were deliberately undermining Middle East peace by ousting secular governments who wanted peace with Israel and replacing such governments with Muslim Brotherhood/Al-Qaeda, yes, the same people who hit us on 9/11.
This very scenario did indeed come about with secular governments in Egypt and Libya being replaced with Muslim Brotherhood/Al-Qaeda while the ousting of the secular Syrian government was underway.
The Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt immediately threatened war with Israel and started exterminating Christians and other minorities. President Obama’s response to the new Muslim Brotherhood government was to sell them F-16 fighter planes, in this writer’s opinion and also quite obviously, to use against Israel.
Fortunately the Egyptian military, which is largely secular, trained in the United States, and knows very well that war with Israel is hopeless if not suicidal, overthrew the Muslim Brotherhood government, took power, and worked to stop the persecution of said minorities. President Obama’s “punishment” was to demand that the Muslim Brotherhood government be restored and he halted the sale of the fighter planes.
Fast forward to Benghazi, Libya where four Americans were killed and dozens injured, secret documents in both our consulate and CIA annex were exposed, national security compromised. It was all avoidable.
We know that in spite of the fact that they asked for better security hundreds of times, Hillary stripped their security from them and Hillary actually hired an offshoot of Al-Qaeda to provide security for our consulate.
There is evidence to show that the State Department was using the facility to send weapons to Muslim Brotherhood and pre-ISIS Islamic radicals. The fewer patriotic Americans on site who would leak such idiocy if they found out about it the better, hence most of the American security was stripped from them…and now they are dead.
[See our previous Benghazi and Libya coverage HERE]
One of the weapons dealers the State Department used was Marc Turi. After they used him and after things went bad as they did in Benghazi, the Obama Administration decided to “tidy up” and moved to prosecute Turi and accuse him of dealing weapons to terrorists, even though he was doing so on orders from the United States Government, in particular, Hillary Clinton’s State Department.
So in order to fight back, Turi, who apparently kept meticulous records and evidence, threatened to expose Hillary’s role in all of this highly illegal activity. The Department of Justice then petitioned the Court to drop all charges against Mr. Turi and made it clear that the petition to the court was for political reasons.
Watch the video carefully.
FLASHBACK: Hillary’s own email chain shows she knew she was lying about Benghazi attacks (video)
Watch and see for yourself. This is as caught as caught gets. Hillary is now being sued for wrongful death, defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress by the families of those killed in Benghazi. She would be wise to settle out of court…
Clinton Campaign Email: How to Rig Polls…
The Clinton Campaign hired Atlas Research who makes recommendations to the campaign and the media for how to get the desired result from polling by targeting certain zip codes, minority groups, Spanish only speakers etc.
Why rig a poll? Rigging a poll to make news is desirable for the “band wagon” effect. If people think that “everybody wants Clinton” many people will not want to feel left out, alienated or different so they get on the band wagon.
Thanks to WikiLeaks we know that dozens of elite media journalists are actively coordinating with the Clinton Campaign (2, 3, 4), this is why it is no surprise that so many polls sponsored by the elite media oversample democrats or poll people who aren’t even going to vote to get the desired result.
In this email the Clinton campaign staff discusses how to generate rigged polling for the media. Here is the presentation attached in this email. See for yourself:

How the Clinton’s Helped Destroy Haiti (video)
They took they money and the grants and funneled it to their pals who ended up not doing much for Haiti.
Related: ABC News: Hillary emails show how State Dept gave Haiti relief contracts to donors and friends
Top Clinton Insider Email: Bribery Laws “REALLY dicey territory” for Hillary
In this email exchange provided by Wikileaks, her top staff says straight up that bribery laws are “REALLY dicey territory” for Hillary Clinton. It goes on to say that Hillary is “so tainted that she is really vulnerable.”
The email is between Neera Tanden, the current head oh the Clinton’s pet think tank, campaign adviser etc. and Jake Sullivan, top foreign policy adviser to Hillary Clinton. Copied in the email are campaign chairman John Podesta and Sara Solow.
Read the email for yourself HERE.
Our friends at Zero Hedge did a GREAT job highlighting the pertinent parts of this email:
Hillary tells donors vetting of Syrian refugees impossible. Obama Admin tells Congress there is no attempt to screen for militant views (video)
Obama promised us in speech after speech that there would be strong accurate vetting so that we do not see the mass immigration violence like has been seen France, Germany, Sweden, Amsterdam etc. His State Department tells Congress the exact opposite.
Watch for yourself:
In the video above Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions asks Simon Henshaw, the Deputy Assistant Secretary at the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migrants of the State Department, “do you make any inquiry about practices that we reject in the United States, like female genital mutilation?” It seems that the Obama Administration thinks that such questions would be rude.
The Daily Caller reports that at least 23 refugees have been implicated in terrorism in the United States since 2010.
Hillary Clinton also told us that we would be safe and there would be strong vetting, but in a private speech to a donor group she said this:
Hillary pays men at Clinton Foundation MUCH more than women. Massive pay gap.
Hillary’s own campaign staff, in emails provided by WikiLeaks, talks about how there is a $112,000 pay gap between men and women at the Clinton Foundation. Read the email for yourself HERE.
The Washington Times summarizes:
Hacked emails belonging to Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta show her inner circle admitting to a “huge” $112,000 pay gap at The Clinton Foundation between the highest-paid men and women.
Mrs. Clinton’s campaign website says “women earn less than men across our economy.” Stolen documents released by WikiLeaks demonstrate that her own foundation — as recently as February 2015 — was guilty of the same.
“Guys — Given the story yesterday about pay equity at the State Department, I wanted to flag something that came out of our research on pay equity at the Foundation,” future Clinton campaign staffer Ian Mandel said in an Feb. 24, 2015 email. “There are huge discrepancies, and it wouldn’t surprise me if they went here next. See a summary below from Karuna.”
Karuna Seshasai, another future addition to the Democrat hopeful’s campaign, then addressed The Clinton Foundation’s “huge” gender pay gap.
“3 out of the 11 highest paid employees of the Foundation are women. Avg salary of the highest paid men is $294,157.50, while the avg salary of the highest paid women is $181,576.66 ($112K difference),” Mrs. Seshasai said in an email seen by campaign manager Robby Mook and Cheryl Mills, Mrs. Clinton’s State Department chief of staff. “Median salary of the highest paid men is $346,106, while the median salary of the highest paid women is $185,386 ($190K difference).”
Mrs. Seshasai’s analysis came just one day after a report by The Washington Free Beacon that detailed Mrs. Clinton’s gender pay gap for staff during her time as a New York senator.
ObamaCare Costs Skyrocket. Fewer Have Private Insurance Today Than in 2007.
As many of our readers have seen in news reports, ObamaCare premiums (the part that you pay) are going up in a big way. Who can afford such expensive monthly payments and on top of that an out of pocket deductible of $6,000? As predicted so long ago, only the very sick would buy such a policy.
Since the economy tanked and has largely flat-lined, many more people are on medicare, but ObamaCare promised to make private insurance more affordable so that it would be easy for regular people to sign up:
…but that’s not what ended up happening. Today, millions are losing their insurance again as insurance companies bail on ObamaCare with massive losses, and even Bill Clinton threw up his hands and said that ObamaCare is the “craziest thing in the world“.
It just didn’t work.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (see table 1.2b), 66.8 percent of those living in the United States had private health insurance in 2007. Now, as of 2015 (the most recent year for which figures are available), only 65.6 percent of those living in the United States have private health insurance.
It turns out that median incomes aren’t the only thing that have dropped since 2007.
There are currently about 320 million people living in America. If the percentage who have private health insurance were as high now as it was in 2007, 3.8 million more people would now have private health insurance.
Meanwhile, the CDC figures show that the percentage of people living in the United States who have public health coverage has risen dramatically, from 18.1 percent in 2007 to 25.3 percent in 2015 (see table 1.2a). If that percentage had stayed the same as in 2007, 23 million fewer people would now have public health coverage. In other words, Obamacare is a massive Medicaid expansion.
35 Lies on Hillary’s web site about her mishandling of classified documents and emails
By Jeff Capella
The complete list of 35 Email Lies Hillary Is Still Posting On Her Campaign Website
Lie #1 – “We’ve put all the information about Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails here.”
This is the first sentence of the “fact sheet,” and it sets the tone for the rest of the document. The FAQ leaves numerous questions unanswered, as the rest of the Clinton campaign’s responses show.
Lie #2 – “Her usage was widely known to the over 100 State Department and U.S. government colleagues she emailed, consistent with the practice of prior Secretaries of State and permitted at the time.”
Clinton’s email habits were not consistent with her predecessors nor was her practice of exclusively using a personal email account permitted. Colin Powell, who served at the beginning of George W. Bush’s term, used a personal AOL account to conduct some government business. But he did not have a private server in the basement of his home. Condoleezza Rice did not use email at all.
Lie #3 – “Was it allowed? Yes.”
The State Department’s IG report, released in May, explicitly stated that Clinton’s email system was neither allowed, nor was it approved by anyone other than Clinton. The report states that State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security and Information Resource Management division would not have okayed the system “because of the restrictions in the [State Department Foreign Affairs Manual] and the security risks in doing so.”
Lie #4 – “Clinton only used her account for unclassified email.”
As Comey stated last week, Clinton sent or received 113 emails that contained information that was classified at the time they were originated. That’s in addition to more than 2,000 emails that contain information that is considered to be classified now.
Lie #5 – “No information in Clinton’s emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them.”
FBI investigators discovered three emails that bore classification markings when they were sent to Clinton. Clinton and the State Department have claimed that two of the emails should not have had markings and that they were left there because of “human error.” There is no evidence that Clinton raised any concerns about the improperly marked email at the time she received it, however.
Lie #6 – “Clinton hopes the State Department and the agencies involved in the review process will sort out as quickly as possible which of the 55,000 pages of emails are appropriate to share with the public.”
There is not a factual misstatement here. But Clinton’s actions leading up to the email scandal and and throughout strongly suggest that she has no interest in sharing information with the public.
Lie #7 – “Classified information was viewed in hard copy while in the office.”
Clinton viewed classified information on her personal BlackBerry, which she almost exclusively used to send and receive emails. She was not allowed to use that BlackBerry at her office for security purposes.
Lie #8 – “While on travel, the State Department had rigorous protocols for her and traveling staff to receive and transmit information of all types.”
Clinton used her commercial-grade BlackBerry to transmit information, even while overseas. A Daily Caller investigation showed that Clinton sent dozens of emails while in spy-riddling nations like China and Russia. (RELATED: Hillary Sent Dozens Of Emails From Her BlackBerry While In China And Russia)
Lie #9 – “A separate, closed email system was used by the State Department for the purposes of handling classified communications, which was designed to prevent such information from being transmitted anywhere other than within that system.”
Clinton transmitted classified information on her personal email system.
Lie #10 – “Is Department of Justice conducting a criminal inquiry into Clinton’s email use? No.”
In his statements last week, Comey said he would not be recommending charges against Clinton for mishandling classified information. Criminal charges were possible, which means that the investigation was criminal in nature.
Lie #11 – “This was not criminal in nature as misreported by some in the press.”
The investigation was criminal in nature.
Lie #12 – “Clinton hopes … that the release will be as timely and as transparent as possible.”
This one is a judgment call. But Clinton has been hammered repeatedly, including by liberal members of the press, for refusing to come clean about her email setup.
Lie #13 – “She also directed her team to give her server that hosted her email account while she was Secretary of State to the Department of Justice…”
The Justice Department requested Clinton’s server, and she gave it to the agency. It ended up in the hands of FBI investigators. Clinton did not hand over the device because she is magnanimous.
Lie #14 – “Clinton has pledged to cooperate with the government’s security inquiry.”
The government was conducting an investigation, not a security inquiry.
Lie #15 – “Even if Clinton’s emails had been on a government address and government device, these questions would be raised prior to public release.”
Clinton makes this statement in order to defend against charges that she sent or received classified information, as if that was the only critique of her email practices. But it obscures the fact that she used a private email system that consisted of a server housed in her basement.
Lie #16 – “It was her practice to email government employees on their ‘.gov’ email address. That way, work emails would be immediately captured and preserved in government record-keeping systems.”
This is a deceptive statement. It is unlikely that Clinton emailed government officials on their .gov email accounts just so that the records would be captured and preserved for record-keeping purposes. And it places the burden of protecting those records on her email partners.
Lie #17 – “Why didn’t Clinton provide her emails to the State Department until December 2014? The State Department asked for the help of the four previous former Secretaries in meeting the State Department’s obligations under the Federal Records Act.”
Clinton has portrayed the State Department’s request for her work emails as part of a large-scale effort to retrieve all past secretaries’ emails. That wasn’t the case. As the State Department said last year, the discovery by State Department lawyers that Clinton used a private email account sparked the agency’s decision to request her emails as well as those of her predecessors.
Lie #18 – “In providing these emails to the Department, Clinton included all that she had that were even remotely work-related.”
This is flatly false. Comey said that FBI investigators recovered “several thousand” emails from Clinton’s server that she did not give to the State Department. The majority were most likely deleted by Clinton’s legal team after the review of her email account was conducted in Fall 2014.
Lie #19 – “…erring on the side of over-inclusion.”
Clinton claims that the trove of emails she gave the State Department was “over-inclusive” because the agency deemed around 1,250 to be personal in nature. But she was actually under-inclusive given that she failed to turn over the “several thousand” emails that the FBI later recovered.
Lie #20 – “After providing her work and potentially work-related emails, she chose not to keep her personal, non-work-related emails, which by definition, are not federal records and were not requested by the Department or anyone else.”
Clinton directed her legal team to delete “several thousand” work-related emails.
Lie #21 – “As Clinton has said before, these were private, personal messages, including emails about her daughter’s wedding plans, her mother’s funeral services and condolence notes, as well as emails on family vacations, yoga routines, and other items one would typically find in their own email account.”
“Several thousand” of the emails Clinton had deleted were not “private, personal messages.” The FBI is reportedly turning those records over to the State Department, and they could be made available through the Freedom of Information Act.
Lie #22 – “As noted, the emails that Clinton chose not to keep were personal emails — they were not federal records or even work-related.”
Flatly wrong, as noted above.
Lie #23 – “In March 2015, when Rep. Gowdy issued a subpoena to Clinton, the State Department had received all of Clinton’s work-related emails in response to their 2014 request.”
Flatly wrong, as noted above.
Lie #24 – “Were any work items deleted in the course of producing the printed copies? No.”
Flatly wrong, as noted above.
Lie #25 – “This entailed a multi-step process to review each email and provide printed copies of Clinton’s emails to the State Department, erring on the side of including anything that might be event potentially work-related.”
Flatly wrong, as noted above. Clinton’s campaign has given inconsistent statements about the “multi-step process” used to search her emails for work-related records. Last March, her campaign spokesman, Nick Merrill, told Time that Clinton’s lawyers read all of her emails. Last week Comey said the lawyers used keyword searches to narrow down possibly work emails but did not read all of the records.
Lie #26 – “Did she withhold any work emails? She provided the State Department with all work and potentially work-related emails that she had, including all of her correspondence with Sid Blumenthal.”
Flatly wrong, as noted above.
Lie #27 – “She has also taken the unprecedented step of asking that those emails be made public.”
This is a deceptive statement. Clinton took an unprecedented step by asking that her emails be made public knowing that the State Department would not unilaterally release the records. Nor would they do so without a thorough review or through the FOIA process.
The most unprecedented step Clinton took was to use a private email server to maintain a personal email account. No other cabinet official is known to have done that in the history of the United States.
Lie #28 – “After her work-related emails were identified and preserved, Clinton chose not to keep her private, personal emails that were not federal records, including emails about her daughter’s wedding plans, her mother’s funeral service, family vacations, etc.”
Flatly wrong, as noted above.
Lie #29 – “The server for her email was physically located on her property, which was protected by U.S. Secret Service.”
This is a deceptive non-sequitur intended to leave the impression that Clinton’s email server was safe and secure. But the greatest threat to the server was not physical in nature. It risked being hacked through the Internet.
Lie #30 – “The security and integrity of her family’s electronic communications was taken seriously from the onset when it was first set up for President Clinton’s team.”
This is self-evidently wrong. Clinton must not have taken the security of her electronic communications seriously if she used an email account hosted on a private server housed in the basement of her home to send classified government emails. Both the State Department IG report and Comey noted that Clinton’s system required an around-the-clock team of technicians to ensure its security. She did not have that. Bryan Pagliano, a State Department information technology specialist who had worked on her 2008 campaign, managed the system. State Department records suggest that Pagliano was underqualified for the job.
Lie #31 – “Suffice it to say, robust protections were put in place and additional upgrades and techniques employed over time.”
See above.
Lie #32 – “Was the server ever hacked? No, there is no evidence there was ever a breach.”
Clinton cannot definitively say that her server was not hacked, as Comey suggested last week. He said that there is no “direct evidence” that the server was hacked. But he also said that it was unlikely that sophisticated foreign hackers would leave direct evidence. Comey said it would not be surprising to find out that the server was hacked since Clinton accessed her email system through her personal BlackBerry while traveling overseas and emailing with friends on their commercial email accounts.
Lie #33 – “Was there ever an unauthorized intrusion into her email or did anyone else have access to it? No.”
Clinton cannot definitively say her email was not breached.
Lie #34 – “Was the State Department able to respond to requests related to FOIA or Congressional requests before they received copies of her work-related emails? Yes.”
This is wrong. The State Department declined numerous FOIA requests filed for Clinton’s email records while she was in office. The agency’s records management office rejected the requests because workers were unaware of Clinton’s email arrangement. In one case cited in a State Department IG report issued in January, Clinton’s chief of staff Cheryl Mills was told of a FOIA request for information about Clinton’s email account. The request was rejected even though Mills emailed Clinton almost daily. (RELATED: IG: Cheryl Mills Gave ‘Inaccurate And Incomplete’ Response To Request For Hillary’s Emails)
Lie #35 – “The State Department was able to search and produce Clinton’s emails when needed long before, and unrelated to, receiving the printed copies as they were already captured on state.gov accounts.”
Democrats on House Benghazi Committee Secretly Colluded with Clinton Campaign, Undermined Investigation
Four Americans were killed in Benghazi and dozens injured, secret documents in both our consulate and CIA annex were exposed, national security compromised. It was all avoidable.
We know that in spite of the fact that they asked for better security hundreds of times, Hillary stripped their security from them and Hillary actually hired an offshoot of Al-Qaeda (yes the guys who carried out the 9/11 attacks) to provide security for our consulate.
There is evidence to show that the State Department was using the facility to send weapons to Muslim Brotherhood and pre-ISIS Islamic radicals who were fighting Syrian strongman Bashir Al-Assad. The fewer patriotic Americans on site who would leak such idiocy if they found out about it the better, hence most of the American security was stripped from them…and now they are dead.
[See our previous Benghazi and Libya coverage HERE]
Democrats have said over and over that the Benghazi investigation was purely political. Democrats, along with their friends in the elite media, have said that the attacks have been investigated and resolved.
To this day, thanks to Obama Administration stone walling, most of our Benghazi questions to this day have not been answered:
Thanks to Clinton campaign emails released by WikiLeaks we see very clearly just who was politicizing what rather than working to find the truth. The email:

The Daily Caller summarizes:
New documents released by WikiLeaks in connection with its dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s email indicate that Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi coordinated with David Kendall, Bill and Hillary Clinton’s long time private counsel.
Kendall, of Williams & Connolly, has represented the Clinton’s since 1993, when he was retained in connection with the Whitewater investigation.
“Benghazi Committe Dems want us to know that Gowdy has just quietly signed up to appear live on FTN this Sunday,” Kendall wrote, in reference to Face the Nation, the CBS Sunday morning political program hosted by John Dickerson. “Apparently, R’s were disappointed in how little media pick up the SB email ‘revelations’ got. I’m not sure there’s much we can do but be forewarned,” he continued, in reference to news that Sidney Blumenthal, a long time Clinton confidant who was banned from joining the administration by White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, was advising Mrs. Clinton in an informal capacity.
The email was sent to Jennifer Palmieri, the campaign’s communications director, and Nick Merrill, Clinton’s traveling press secretary. Senior Clinton aides Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, and Katherine Turner were also copied on the message. All three are lawyers who have counseled Clinton throughout the probe of the private email server she maintained during her tenure as Secretary of State. All three were present when she was questioned by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Mills forwarded the email to “hdr29@hrcoffice.com,” the email address Clinton appears to have been using at the time. The address is no longer active.
“Can we do another video w Brian Fallon or another campaign press person debunking it all before he appears so he has to respond?,” Clinton responded. Fallon is a campaign spokesman.
NEWSGATE – Sharyl Attkisson outs dishonest reporters who collude with politicians

While WikiLeaks has given us a partial list of reporters who colluded with the Clinton campaign to help sway the election.
In her lengthy post, veteran CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson outs dishonest reporters by name and is keeping the list updated. She called the scandal NEWSGATE.
The following accounts come from human sources, Freedom of Information Act documents and Wikileaks emails. Obviously, this is just a small sampling of the behind the scenes dealings going on between reporters and their sources.
Continue reading HERE.
Could WikiLeaks emails be faked? Answers here.
By the Editor
Could WikiLeaks emails be fake? In order to make the case that they are fake one would have to overcome the following eight facts and problems.
1 – WikiLeaks has NEVER had to retract a story, document, or publication because it was found to be false or faked. WikiLeaks has exposed millions of documents from various governments for over a decade. They have no track record of doctoring anything, when one reads the emails for oneself, they are compelling.
2 – It is not a crime to invent fake documents and call them classified. The fact that US Government wants Assange for spreading classified intel (mostly stuff that was classified because it was embarrassing) by default means the US Government has confirmed that WikiLeaks documents are genuine.
3 – WikiLeaks is a foreign group, they are not Republicans or Democrats, their agenda is transparency with all governments….and that is the agenda of their donors. To risk losing credibility is to risk losing all funding from their crowd sourcing etc. They have every motivation to keep things on the up & up. Also worthy of note is that Anonymous is a foreign hacker group and they say that Hillary is corrupt.
4 – Most importantly, Hillary and her top staff, according to the State Department IG and FBI, were beyond careless and even contemptuous of national security and communications security protocols – their words not ours. In short, they were begging to get hacked and they did.
5 – Exactly ZERO of the dozens of reporters who were caught unethically coordinating with the Clinton campaign have come out and said the emails are fake.
6 – That said, we are talking about dozens of emails every day from the Clinton Campaign’s staff and the DNC – OVER THE COURSE OF YEARS. No one could manufacture hundreds of thousands fake emails and make it all accurate to the minute with the lives of hundreds of people. If it was fake it would be easy to debunk because no one could know that many details about so many people’s lives on a day to day basis over such a lengthy stretch of time.
7 – Information technology is reasonably secure, the complete emails headers, IT routing information etc, is included with each email at a tab at the top, all of which can be tracked and really is not fakable on a mass scale to this degree. The number of servers and routers that would have to be hacked to insert reams of false data makes this nigh impossible.
8 – Many of the emails in question with the Hillary Campaign, including some of the emails with Donna Brazile, used DKIM authentication which even the NSA might not be able to spoof.
DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is an email authentication method designed to detect email spoofing. It allows the receiver to check that an email claimed to come from a specific domain was indeed authorized by the owner of that domain. It is intended to prevent forged sender addresses in emails, a technique often used in phishing and email spam.
In technical terms, DKIM lets a domain associate its name with an email message by affixing a digital signature to it. Verification is carried out using the signer’s public key published in the DNS. A valid signature guarantees that some parts of the email (possibly including attachments) have not been modified since the signature was affixed.
DNC Chair Donna Brazile in internal campaign mails: economy, people in despair…..

Donna Brazile seems like such a sweet lady. Look at that bright smile! She wouldn’t lie to you would she?
UPDATE – Donna Brazile received debate questions from CNN in advance and passed them to Hillary. Caught lying about it – LINK.
…….but we now know thanks to tens of thousands of leaked documents via WikiLeaks, congressional investigations, and the courts mandating the release of government documents, that virtually the entire Democratic Party leadership is a corrupt lying cabal that is enriching itself and their donors at our expense…
……and the corporate media either ignores it or simply reports on their web site so they can say that they covered it, which is why you missed it on the front page and on the network news.
[NOTE: The previous Democrat Party Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was forced to step down after leaked emails show that she improperly used the resources and personnel of the DNC to rig the primary against Bernie Sanders.]
On Twitter, Democratic Party Chairman Donna Brazile tells us that the economy is just great!
And in emails among top Hillary Clinton campaign staffers she says very differently:

New State Department Docs Show More Illegal Coordination Between Hillary and Big $$$ Donors
When you are the Secretary of State you are mandated to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
Giving donors to your private foundation access to State Department resources and favors when your foundation pays you huge speech fees goes way beyond the mere appearance of impropriety. Giving donors briefings with classified information breaks an entire host of laws. Newly released State Department documents reveal even more of just that.
Of course, the Clinton Foundation being tax free, breaks the law when it engages in partisan politics.
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 207 pages of new Department of State documents, including previously unreleased email exchanges in which Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin worked with top Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) executives to set up group photo sessions for Clinton with “primary sponsors” of CGI and members of the CGI staff. CGI is a project of the Clinton Foundation.
The new records also reveal that Abedin sent classified information concerning “foreign relations or foreign activities of the U.S., including confidential sources,” about Afghanistan to her own unsecured email address. Also included are more instances of the State Department doing special favors for high-dollar Clinton Foundation donors and the distribution of Clinton’s government schedule to members of the Clinton Foundation staff.
The new documents contained seven Hillary Clinton email exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date of such emails uncovered by Judicial Watch to 235 of new Clinton emails (not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department). These records further appear to contradict statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department.
Read more HERE.
CNS News has more details:
(CNSNews.com) — Newly released Department of State documents show that longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin helped top executives at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) set up then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for group photo sessions with primary sponsors of CGI and its staff members in September 2009.
CGI is a project of the Clinton Foundation. Clinton served as Secretary of State from January 2009 to February 2013. The photo sessions occurred at a CGI meeting on Sept. 25, 2009, just prior to a speech by Secretary Clinton.
The documents were obtained by the government watchdog group Judicial Watch. There are 207 pages of State Department material, including a series of email exchanges between Abedin, who served as Clinton’s deputy chief of staff during her time as Secretary of State, and CGI executives regarding a request for a group photo session with Clinton and “about 20” primary CGI sponsors prior to the secretary’s speech.
Although not mentioned by name in the email exchange, the primary sponsors of the 2009 CGI Annual Meeting, according to Judicial Watch and the CGI website, included Tom Golisano; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Laureate International Universities; P&G; Victor Pinchuk Foundation; Grupo ABC; Shangri La Industries; Booz Allen Hamilton; Cisco; Duke Energy; ExxonMobil; Hewlett-Packard Company; Standard Chartered; Swiss Re; Goldman Sachs; The Rockefeller Foundation; CLSA (Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia); Crédit Agricole; The EKTA Foundation; The Economist; Dell; Deutsche Bank; Microsoft; Inter-American Development Bank; Visa; APCO Worldwide; Diageo; Knoll; and PR Newswire.
Clinton Campaign emails: How do we answer when asked about the (illegal) deletions?
The Federal Records Act says that government business on email must be archived on government servers. The Espionage Act says that classified information may not go out on unsecured or unauthorized networks. The law is that once something is under subpoena if you delete it, that is obstruction of justice.
Hillary and her staff did all of this countless times. When asked about it the reflexive answer was not just to simply tell the truth, it was to invent the best possible answer to benefit them. This of course, is also obstruction because they know that the FBI and Congress will be asking these very questions. No indication of just telling the truth is suggested.
You can real the email HERE:

VIDEO: Clinton Campaign appears to feed NBC’s Andrea Mitchell questions via cell-phone
We have seen this before. Hillary Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill gives hand picked questions to friendly reporters.
Thanks to Hillary’s campaign emails being released by Wikileaks we know that a great many reporters, like NBC’s Andrea Mitchell shown here, are advising and coordinating with the campaign to give the most favorable coverage possible.
Former FBI Deputry Director: Investigation of Hillary Absolutely Contrary to How FBI Operates
Former FBI Director James Kallstrom explains how he is heart broken by how the Obama Administration and FBI Director Comey have conducted themselves in the investigation of multiple violations of the Espionage Act and the Federal Records Act by Hillary Clinton and her top staff.
Listen for yourself:
RELATED: FBI Tried to Conceal State Dept Offer of Quid-Pro-Quo to FBI to Cover for Hillary https://politicalarena.org/2016/10/17/11872/
Tax Returns Show Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10% on Charitable Grants, Not 90%
Remember when Hillary said in the debate that 90% of what the Clinton Foundation brings in goes to charity and those in need? Well those in need must include themselves and their pals according to their 2013 tax filing:
http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2013/311/580/2013-311580204-0b0083da-9.pdf
Their tweet with graphic below is simply a lie straight up.
There’s only one problem: that claim is demonstrably false. And it is false not according to some partisan spin on the numbers, but because the organization’s own tax filings contradict the claim.

In order for the 88 percent claim to be even remotely close to the truth, the words “directly” and “life-changing” have to mean something other than “directly” and “life-changing.” For example, the Clinton Foundation spent nearly $8.5 million–10 percent of all 2013 expenditures–on travel. Do plane tickets and hotel accommodations directly change lives? Nearly $4.8 million–5.6 percent of all expenditures–was spent on office supplies. Are ink cartridges and staplers “life-changing” commodities?
Those two categories alone comprise over 15 percent of all Clinton Foundation expenses in 2013, and we haven’t even examined other spending categories like employee fringe benefits ($3.7 million), IT costs ($2.1 million), rent ($4 million) or conferences and conventions ($9.2 million). Yet, the tax-exempt organization claimed in its tweet that no more than 12 percent of its expenditures went to these overhead expenses.
How can both claims be true? Easy: they’re not. The claim from the Clinton Foundation that 88 percent of all expenditures go directly to life-changing work is demonstrably false.
Democrats laughed at Romney when he said Russia was a geopolitical threat…

Remember when Democrats Laughed at Romney when he said Russia was a geopolitical threat? Now Hillary and the Democrats can’t stop saying it.
By the RSC:
On Russia, Obama Has Completely Flipped From His 2012 Viewpoint: 7 Key Points.
The media thought President Obama’s best zinger in the October 22, 2012 debate was telling Mitt Romney “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back, because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.”
He also said Romney “acts like he thinks the Cold War’s on. I don’t know where he’s been.”
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev backed up Obama and said Romney was stuck in a Cold War mentality.
The Democratic Party described it as an example of “Romney vs. reality”, and claiming Russia is a foe demonstrates “Romney’s not ready.”
Gen. Joe Dunford was appointed Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by Obama, and agreed with Romney’s warning. Russia’s UN envoy has said that relations with America are at their tensest in 40 years.
Romney’s position has become the conventional view, and Vladimir Putin is constantly scaring the world.
The important point is what Obama is saying today. The President has completely reversed himself and now says Russia:
1) Is hitting us with constant cyber attacks and has hacked into election sites. He claims they are trying to undermine our democracy.
2) Sanctions on Russia expire next month, and Obama is urging European leaders to keep and increase them.
3) He says Russia has broken many of their promises and is guilty of mass slaughter of innocent civilians in Syria, where over 500,000 have died.
4) He says they illegally annexed Crimea and are threatening eastern Ukraine where 10,000 have died.
5) The State Department says Russia has moved nuclear weapons into Kaliningrad and is threatening the Baltic states and Europe.
6) Russia’s state owned television news is full of nuclear threats, and reports on ballistic missiles and bomb shelters.
7) Putin has learned that he can defy America and come out on top. Mild Western sanctions make ordinary Russians worse off, but they also give the people an enemy to unite against.
Obama Talked About Election Rigging in 2008 Speech (video)
When Democrats say this its just fine. When a Republican says the same thing the elite media has a cow and congressional leaders who cave to the elite media like Marco Rubio go along with them.
NYT: Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
Wikileaks: Podesta’s Daughter Received His Shares in Putin-Linked Company
Flashback April, 23, 2015 New York Times:
The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
Miss USA 2005: Trump has been my mentor for 11 years. Blasts phony Trump accusers.

Donald Trump is surrounded by and mentors women like Chelsea Cooley pictured above every day. Trump has deep pockets and as yet has never been sued for sexual harassment or accused of anything until three weeks before a presidential election.
We are just going to say it. Are we to believe a People Magazine reporter whose story is falling apart, that claims that Donald chased her around the furniture on his one year anniversary with the magnificent Melania? Being impolitic but brutally honest because truth matters, the reporter from People Magazine is straight up homely.
Cooley tells the UK Daily Mail:
[Editor’s Note – Notice that Cooley had to talk to the UK newspapers as the New York Times, AP and the American TV Networks won’t speak with her…]
- Chelsea Cooley competed in Donald Trump’s Miss Universe competition in 2005, after being crowned Miss USA in the same year
- She says she will always be grateful to Trump for the kindness he showed her, adding that he has become her business mentor in recent years
- Cooley questions the credibility of women who have rocked Trump’s political campaign with sexual assault allegations
- Cooley, who herself was sexually assaulted by a restaurant manager when she was just 16, also questions the timing of the alleged victims’ claims
- Cooley, who has known Trump for 11 years, claims that she never once saw him act inappropriately