Lies of omission are still lies and doubly so in matters of law.
Biden Administration Attorney General Merrick Garland stated that his Department of Justice (DoJ) filed a motion to unseal the warrant “in light of the former president’s public confirmation of the search, the surrounding circumstances, and the substantial public interest in this matter,” but that isn’t the whole truth. Then Garland proceeded to virtue signal about how even handed and fair they are as you can see in the video below. “
What happened to justice being about “the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth?”
The judge, Magistrate Bruce Reinhart, who was a lawyer for the infamous child trafficker Jeffery Epstein, and who trashed Trump on social media, signed off on the warrant to raid Trump’s home, but even though it is common for low ranking judges to simply be a rubber stamp when it comes to search warrant requests, this was no ordinary search warrant, this was an unprecedented raid on a former president, over a common dispute that former presidents virtually always have with the National Archives over what is personal property and what should go to the archives. Judge Reinhart should have denied the warrant and told the DoJ to simply serve a subpoena and let it all get hashed out in court. Reinhart is facing a breathtaking amount of pushback.
Judicial Watch filed a motion to unseal the warrant on August 10th and Magistrate Reinhart approved and ordered it.
AG Garland tried to make it look like he filed a motion to unseal the warrant in the name of transparency, but that is not the case, he did it because the judge ordered it.
Former federal prosecutor Mike Davis went even further, saying the raid may have been illegally invasive.
“Under the case law, you can’t do a home raid if you can secure the documents through less intrusive means,” he told “Bannon’s War Room” on Aug. 9.
The FBI had to first determine that requests for the documents or even subpoenas wouldn’t be sufficient, said Davis, who formerly advised Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on judicial nominations and now heads The Article III Project.
“There’s zero evidence” that Trump wouldn’t have cooperated, Davis said.
“There was no allegation or evidence that he [Trump] was destroying any of this evidence or putting it into the wrong hands. This is banana republic-level tactics from the Biden Justice Department,” he said.
Even if Trump took classified documents, he took possession of them when he was still chief executive and had the authority to declassify them, according to Davis.
[Christina] Bobb suggested that the invocation of classified documents was a disingenuous attempt of “shrouding this in a national security blanket.”
Readers should keep in mind it was Attorney General Garland who sent DHS and FBI resources against parents speaking up at school board meetings by declaring them to be domestic terrorists. He did so without revealing his conflict of interest that his family is in the business of publishing Critical Race Theory (CRT) materials to sell to schools.
IS BIDEN’S AG MERRICK GARLAND A CROOK? ORDERS FBI TO INVESTIGATE PARENTS OPPOSING CRT HATE IN SCHOOLS. GARLAND’S SON PUBLISHES CRT PROPAGANDA. – LINK
BIDEN ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND’S CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY A DISASTER (VIDEO) – LINK
HOMELAND SECURITY AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETING AND GOP EVENTS IN VIRGINIA HOURS AFTER ATTORNEY GENERAL GARLAND TESTIFIED UNDER OATH IT WOULDN’T HAPPEN (VIDEO) – LINK