Obama White House Pays Women 18% Less… and His 2008 Campaign Did too….

As we reported in July 2008: The Obama Campiagn was paying women less, when McCain was paying them more; all while Obama accused McCain of not supporting equal pay for women – LINK

The Washington Beacon:

Female employees in the Obama White House make considerably less than their male colleagues, records show.

According to the 2011 annual report on White House staff, female employees earned a median annual salary of $60,000, which was about 18 percent less than the median salary for male employees ($71,000).

Calculating the median salary for each gender required some assumptions to be made based on the employee names. When unclear, every effort was taken to determine the appropriate gender.

The Obama campaign on Wednesday lashed out at presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney for his failure to immediately endorse the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act, a controversial law enacted in 2009 that made it easier to file discrimination lawsuits.

President Obama has frequently criticized the gender pay gap, such as the one that exists in White House.

“Paycheck discrimination hurts families who lose out on badly needed income,” he said in a July 2010 statement. “And with so many families depending on women’s wages, it hurts the American economy as a whole.”

It is not known whether any female employees at the White House have filed lawsuits under the Ledbetter Act.

The president and his Democratic allies have accused Republicans of waging a “war on women,” and have touted themselves as champions of female equality. Obama’s rhetoric, however, has not always been supported by his actions.

White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters last week that Obama believes it is “long past the time” for women to be admitted to the traditionally all-male Augusta National Golf Club, site of the Masters golf tournament.

But the president has demonstrated a strong preference for all-male foursomes in his frequent golf outings, a bias that extends well beyond the putting green and into the Oval Office.

“Women are Obama’s base, and they don’t seem to have enough people who look like the base inside of their own inner circle,” former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers told the New York Times.

In a 2011 article titled “The White House Boys’ Club: President Obama Has a Woman Problem,” TIME magazine’s Amy Sullivan detailed the president’s fondness for male-dominated environments.

“There’s a looseness to Obama when he’s hanging out with the boys club that doesn’t appear in co-ed gatherings,” she wrote. “The president blows off steam on the golf course with male colleagues and friends. He takes to the White House basketball court with NBA stars, men’s college players, and male cabinet members and members of Congress.”

As a presidential candidate in 2008, Obama was criticized for paying the women on his campaign staff less than the men, and far less than GOP opponent John McCain paid his female staffers.

One thought on “Obama White House Pays Women 18% Less… and His 2008 Campaign Did too….”

  1. The one thing this representation does not address is Equal pay for Equal work. It simply states on average women employed make 18% less in the Obama White House. This statistic lacks any substance because there is no comparison in regards to the job. The equal pay for equal work is the issue.

    And to further the ridiculousness of your argument you bring in blowing off steam with male counterparts on the golf course as if to say the President shouldn’t be allowed any time to just be a guy? To be honest, I’m glad he has a group of guys he can let go with.

    I supposed women should be criticized for having female companions that they can kvetch with? I’m sure a group of women together doesn’t act different at all when men are in the room?!?!?

    Now, if you can get the specific statistics and job level and do an even comparison and do away with criticizing either gender for spending time with their own – then I would be interested.

    Your points are meatless.

    [Political Arena Editor Responds:

    They are not meatless, statistically there is a pattern of behavior and there is also the issue of the President’s hypocrisy.

    Also, if the roles were reversed do you believe for even one moment that the Democrat Media Complex and the White House campaign surrogates would not use them against Republicans?

    So with all due respect, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. – Editor]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s